Paris under the Commune: The Seventy-Three Days of the Second Siege; with Numerous Illustrations, Sketches Taken on the Spot, and Portraits (from the Original Photographs)Leighton, John
History
Paris under the Commune: The Seventy-Three Days of the Second Siege; with Numerous Illustrations, Sketches Taken on the Spot, and Portraits (from the Original Photographs)
Leighton, John
Paris (France) -- History -- Commune, 1871
I’m surprised myself, as I re-read the preceding pages, at the strange
contradictions I meet with. During the first few days I was almost
favourable to the Commune; I waited, I hoped. To-day all is very
different. When I write down in the evening what I have seen and
thought in the day, I allow myself to blame with severity men that
inspired me formerly with some kind of sympathy. What has taken place?
Have my opinions changed? I do not think so. Besides, I have in reality
but one opinion. I receive impressions, describing these impressions
without reserve, without prejudice. If these stray leaves should ever
be collected in a volume, they will at least possess the rare merit of
being thoroughly sincere. Is it then, that my nature is modified? By no
means. If I were indulgent a month ago, it was that I did not know
those of whom I spoke, and that I am of a naturally hopeful and
benevolent disposition: if I now show myself severe, it is that—like
the rest of Paris—I have learned to know them better.
LXIX.
The Commune has naturally brought an infinite number of journals into
existence. Try, if you will, to count the leaves of the forest, the
grains of sand on the seashore, the stars in the heavens, but do not,
in your wildest dreams, attempt to enumerate the newspapers that have
seen the light since the famous day of the 18th of March. Félix Pyat
has a journal, _Le Vengeur_; Vermorel has a journal, _Le Cri du
People_; Delescluze has a journal, _Le Reveil_; there is not a member
of the Commune but indulges in the luxury of a sheet in which he tells
his colleagues daily all the evil he thinks of them. It must be
acknowledged that these gentlemen have an extremely bad opinion one of
the other. I defy even the _Gaulois_ of Versailles—yes, the _Gaulois_
itself—to treat Félix Pyat as Vermorel treats him, and if it be
remembered on the other hand what Félix Pyat says of Vermorel, the
_Gaulois_ will be found singularly good-natured. Napoleon cautioned us
long ago “to wash our dirty linen at home,” but good patriots cannot be
expected to profit by the counsels of a tyrant. So the columns of the
Commune papers are devoted to the daily and mutual pulling to pieces of
the Commune’s members. But where will these ephemeral sheets be in six
months, in one month, or in a week’s time perhaps? The wind which wafts
away the leaves of the rose and the laurel, will be no less cruel for
the political leaves. Let us then, for the sake of posterity, offer a
specimen of what is—or as we shall soon say, what was—the Communalist
press of to-day. Be they edited by Marotteau, or Duchesne, or Paschal
Grousset, or by any other emulator of Paul-Louis Courier, these worthy
journals are all much alike, and one example will suffice for the
whole.
[Illustration: Vermesch (père Duchesne).[72]]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account