Paris under the Commune: The Seventy-Three Days of the Second Siege; with Numerous Illustrations, Sketches Taken on the Spot, and Portraits (from the Original Photographs)Leighton, John
History
Paris under the Commune: The Seventy-Three Days of the Second Siege; with Numerous Illustrations, Sketches Taken on the Spot, and Portraits (from the Original Photographs)
Leighton, John
Paris (France) -- History -- Commune, 1871
“Rumours of dissensions between the majority of the Commune and the
Central Committee have been spread by our common enemies with a
persistency which, once for all, must be crushed by public compact.
“The Central Committee, appointed to the administration of military
affairs by the Committee of Public Safety, will enter upon office
from this day.
“This Committee, which has upheld the standard of the Communal
revolution, has undergone no change and no deterioration. It is
today what it was yesterday, the legitimate defender of the
Commune, the basis of its power, at the same time as it is the
determined enemy of civil war; the sentinel placed by the people to
protect the rights that they have conquered,
“In the name, then, of the Commune, and of the Central Committee,
who sign this pact of good faith, let these gross suspicions and
calumnies be swept away. Let hearts beat, let hands be ready to
strike in the good cause, and may we triumph in the name of union
and fraternity.
“Long live the Republic!
“Long live the Commune!
“Long live the Communal Federation!
“The Commission of the Commune, BERGERET, CHAMPY, GERESME, LEDROIT,
LONGLAS, URBAIN.
“The Central Committee.
“Paris, 18th May, 1871.”
[94] Arnould is a man of about forty-seven years of age, small in
stature, lively and intelligent. He has written in many of the
Democratic journals of Paris and the provinces; and his literary
talents are of a good kind. Being connected with Rochefort’s journal,
the _Marseillaise_, he was sent by the latter to challenge Pierre
Bonaparte, and was a witness at the trial which followed the murder of
Victor Noir.
Although naturally drawn by his connections into the movement of
the eighteenth of March, he always protested loudly against the
arbitrary acts of the Commune, and it is surprising that he did not
fall under accusation, by his colleagues. He opposed particularly
the proposals for the suppression of newspapers. “It is prodigious
to me,” he said, in full meeting of the committee, “that people
will still talk of arresting others for expressing their opinions.”
He voted against the organisation of the Committee of Public Safety
on the ground:—
“That such an institution would be directly opposed to the
political opinions of the electoral body, of which the Commune is
the representative.”
He protested most energetically against secret imprisonment—
“Secret incarceration has something immoral in it; it is moral
torture substituted for physical.
“I cannot understand men who have passed their life in combating
the errors of despotism, falling into the same faults when they
arrive at power. Of two things one: either secret imprisonment is
an indispensable and good thing; or, it is odious. If it was good
it was wrong to oppose it, and if it be odious and immoral, we
ought not to continue it.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account