Pattern for ConquestSmith, George O. (George Oliver)
Science
Pattern for Conquest
Smith, George O. (George Oliver)
Science fiction
"Hotang Lu left three days ago because he was withdrawn. His statement
was that Indan Ko was taking the trip to Vorgan's capitol in order to
offer terms of surrender. Explain that!"
"Indan Ko was intelligent enough to understand the implications behind
fighting. Look, Linzete, I sold Tlembo a theory of operations. You
cannot hope to win alone."
"We can exterminate them."
"And in doing so, render unfit for life a quarter of the Galaxy? That
I will not permit. And, Linzete, any extermination you perform will be
strictly post-mortem. Granted that you have the ships and the men and
the spores all grown or collected and packed into bombs. From a single
bombing of a Loard-vogh planet to extermination of life on that planet
will be a matter of six months to a year. Meanwhile, the Loard-vogh
will have attacked and conquered you. Think Terra didn't think of it?
We did and we considered it well. But Linzete, we like to remain alive.
We destroyed seventeen million of the first-line fighting men. That was
war, and the men were expendable. A nice nasty term. Terra lost seven
thousand because Terra does not consider any man really expendable. The
situation is about even. But consider their utter hatred and violence
to find a single planet bombed into lifelessness ever afterwards by
filling it with sheer death-rot."
"I see the point, but if we're to lose, let's lose honorably, die
fighting, and take as many with us as we can."
"A poor attitude. You must fight to win and to live, Linzete. War is
a means of forcing your will upon an enemy, Linzete. That means there
are a number of different kinds of war. War per se is usually the last
resort. There are social wars and economic wars, and people do not
consider them too violent. But a shooting war gets everybody all worked
up.
"There has been a lot of talk about Terra's secret weapon, Linzete.
It has been explained again and again. Terra's secret weapon is the
intelligence to recognize fact, even though obscured. If you had your
choice, Linzete, which would you rather be, the nominal ruler of a
sector or the man whose advice is taken on every decision--who, in
fact, tells the ruler what to do?"
"Lacking the right to be both acknowledged ruler and factual ruler, I--
That is a problem that has never occurred to me."
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account