Paul and his interpreters : $b A critical historySchweitzer, Albert
Religion
Paul and his interpreters : $b A critical history
Schweitzer, Albert
Bible. Epistles of Paul -- Criticism, interpretation, etc. -- History; Paul, the Apostle, Saint
In the Evangelist, bread and wine are—as is evident to anyone who will
take the trouble to acquaint himself with his presuppositions in the
spiritually related works of Ignatius, Justin, and Tertullian—not the
body and blood of Christ, but the flesh and blood of the Son of Man.
In this change in the expression lies the logic of the thought. The
elements of the Lord’s Supper perpetuate the appearance of the Son of
Man in the world inasmuch as they, as being the flesh and blood of
that historic Personality, possess the capacity of being vehicles of
the Spirit. As a combination of matter and Spirit which can be
communicated to the corporeity of men, they execute judgment. The
elect can in the sacrament become partakers of that spiritual
substance, and can thus be prepared for the resurrection; others who
are not from above, and are not capable of receiving the Spirit,
receive simply earthly food and drink, and fall a prey to corruption.
Therefore the Evangelist makes the Lord close His discourse about the
eating and drinking of the flesh and blood of the Son of Man with the
words, “It is the spirit that giveth life.”
This is the language of the early Greek theology, which explains the
working of the sacraments by the combination of the Spirit with matter
which takes place therein. The Fourth Evangelist projects this later
view back into the discourses of the historic Jesus, and makes Him
prophetically announce that after His exaltation a time will come when
the Spirit which is now in Him will unite itself [pg 201] with the
bread which, by the miracle of the loaves, has just been raised in a
significant way out of the category of simple earthly elements, and
will subsequently manifest its power in preparing men for the
resurrection.
In this sense, as vehicles of the Spirit, the elements carry on the
manifestation of the Son of Man; in this sense it is possible to speak
of eating and drinking His flesh and blood, and to regard this as
necessary to life. But all this is not thought of “corporeally” in the
naïve sense of an eating and drinking of the body and blood of Jesus,
but can only be understood on the basis of the doctrine of the working
of the Spirit in the sacraments. Apart from the Spirit, there is in
the Supper no body and no blood of Christ.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account