Paul and his interpreters : $b A critical historySchweitzer, Albert
Religion
Paul and his interpreters : $b A critical history
Schweitzer, Albert
Bible. Epistles of Paul -- Criticism, interpretation, etc. -- History; Paul, the Apostle, Saint
In Gunkel and Maurenbrecher it is only a stop-gap, which is brought
into a wholly external connexion with the growth of the new religion.
They retain His coming as the phenomenon by which the contact of the
two religious worlds is set up, but not as a fructifying element.
[pg 234]
There is no obvious reason for continuing to take into account this by
no means indispensable auxiliary force. If the Oriental belief in a
redeemer and the Jewish Messianic hope were inherently adapted to one
another, and destined to produce by their fruitful union a new
religion, then, after all, any kind of impulse, even a mere train of
thought, might have set the process in motion. The assumption of the
existence and the death of the Galilaean Rabbi becomes superfluous if
once it ceases to supply the efficient cause for the arising of
Christianity. Since Comparative Religion finds the latter in the
mutual interpenetration of Jewish and Graeco-Oriental elements, it can
get along just as well with myth as with the questionable history of
the Synoptists. Such is the teaching of William Benjamin
Smith,_(_191_)_ and Arthur Drews.
Both these writers make a rather extravagant use of the privilege of
standing outside the ranks of scientific theology. Their imagination
leaps with playful elegance over obstacles of fact and enables them to
discover everywhere the pre-Christian Jesus whom their soul desires,
even in places where an ordinary intelligence can find no trace of
him.
Smith takes it for granted that the “Naasenes, whose origin goes back
to the most remote antiquity, worshipped a Jesus as a divinity.” How
Christianity grew out of this cult he does not tell us, but consoles
us with the promise of later revelations. In the preface he betrays
the fact that he is now only publishing “the first quarter of the
evidence which he has collected,” and intends to go on quietly
collecting and arranging his material “until [pg 235] the whole
irresistible host can take the field together,” and further, that it
is not the—inevitable—victory which is his main concern, but the
stimulus imparted to others.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account