Pearl-Maiden: A Tale of the Fall of JerusalemHaggard, H. Rider (Henry Rider)
History
Pearl-Maiden: A Tale of the Fall of Jerusalem
Haggard, H. Rider (Henry Rider)
Historical fiction; Jerusalem -- History -- Fiction
“Had you stabbed she might have been undone indeed,” he said. “Now, as
of old, there is little wisdom in that gray head of yours, Nehushta;
nor can your hate suffer you to understand the intermingled good and
evil of my heart.” Then he advanced to Miriam, lifted her hand and
kissed it. With a sudden movement she proffered him her brow.
“Nay,” he said, “tempt me not, it is not for me. Farewell.”
Another instant and he was gone.
It would seem that Caleb kept his word, for three days later the vessel
_Luna_ sailed unmolested from the port of Ostia in the charge of the
Greek captain Hector, having on board Miriam, Nehushta, Julia, and
Gallus.
Within a week of this sailing Titus at length returned to Rome. Here in
due course the case of Marcus was brought before him by the prisoner’s
friends, together with a demand that he should be granted a new and
open trial for the clearing of his honour. Titus, who for his own
reasons refused to see Marcus, listened patiently, then gave his
decision.
He rejoiced, he said, to learn that his close friend and trusted
officer was still alive, since he had long mourned him as dead. He
grieved that in his absence he should have been put upon his trial on
the charge of having been taken captive, living, by the Jews, which, if
Marcus upon his arrival in Rome had at once reported himself to him,
would not have happened. He dismissed all accusations against his
military honour and courage as mere idle talk, since he had a hundred
times proved him to be the bravest of men, and knew, moreover,
something of the circumstances under which he was captured. But,
however willing he might be to do so, he was unable for public reasons
to disregard the fact that he had been duly convicted by a
court-martial, under the Prince Domitian, of having broken the command
of his general and suffered himself to be taken prisoner alive. To do
so would be to proclaim himself, Titus, unjust, who had caused others
to suffer for this same offence, and to offer insult to the prince, his
brother, who in the exercise of his discretion as commander in his
absence, had thought fit to order the trial. Still, his punishment
should be of the lightest possible. He commanded that on leaving his
prison Marcus should go straight to his own house by night, so that
there might be no public talk or demonstration among his friends, and
there make such arrangement of his affairs as seemed good to him.
Further, he commanded that within ten days he should leave Italy, to
dwell or travel abroad for a period of three years, unless the time
should be shortened by some special decree. After the lapse of these
three years he would be free to return to Rome. This was his judgment
and it could not be altered.
As it chanced, it was the chamberlain Saturius who first communicated
the Imperial decree to Marcus. Hurrying straight from the palace to the
prison he was admitted into the prisoner’s chamber.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account