“And that should give me great pleasure,” said the General, casting a
comic side-look towards me. Then, with a plain purpose of helping the
scout to his discoveries: “And what of Congress? I suppose both House
and Senate still heave with the ground-swells of the Webster-Hayne
debate.”
“There is no end of cloakroom talk,” said Rhetz. “And, by the way, Mr.
President,”--here was a feeler--“there be folk, and your friends at
that, who wonder you are not openly with Calhoun and against Webster and
his Yankees for this principle of States Rights.” Rhetz followed
this last observe with a setting forth of argument bearing for the
Calhoun-Hayne contention.
“Beware of metaphysics,” observed the General dryly, turning his gray
look against Rhetz, as that rice-land sophist laid down one by one those
various refinements and abstractions wherewith the Palmetto gentry--the
Cal houns and the Butlers and the Pinckneys and the Haynes--were
blazing the path for Secession; “beware of metaphysics! No good comes of
splitting hairs. A rough-hewn honesty--a turgid frankness--should be the
better road.” The General walked on in silence fora brief space, Rhetz
also silent, feeling himself on the brink of some precipice of the
General's temper, and in no sort eager for a fall. “Sir,” resumed the
General, “let me now set you an example; let me be most open with you,
not only for Nullification, but for your friend, Calhoun. First, then,
Calhoun is not trustworthy. Did he not for years teach me to believe he
was my friend with Monroe, when it was he of all that cabinet who
urged my court-martial for taking Florida and hanging Ambristie and
Arbuth-not? Calhoun was my enemy, sir; he is my enemy now. He would hide
the fact, but it is too late. When I tell you how Calhoun is my enemy,
would you still urge on me this prince of duplicity for a statesman
whose word is worth a following? Calhoun, for a plan or a principle, can
not be relied on. He is congenitally bad, and will propose nothing that
is true or high.” Here, as the General's anger began to tower, he would
strike viciously at old weeds, dead and winter-bitten, which ranked the
path we traversed, cutting them down with his hickory stick as with
a saber; Rhetz still silent, without voice. “There lives but one more
trustless than Calhoun--that arch-rogue Clay. And my friends would show
amazement at my failure to be openly with Calhoun! Also, you say they
fear I may follow Webster and his Yankees. Sir, I know the Yankees; they
are a dour, hard brood, who to aid their interests might not scruple to
over-reach. I have yet to hear, however, they betray their friends, as
did Calhoun; I have still to know they would bargain the downfall of
their party, as did Clay. Judas would have done a no more ebon deed than
did that Kentucky renegade when he sold his soul to Adams for a place.
And now am I to take a great doctrine from such children of deceit?
Webster and his Yankees may be centered on themselves and selfish;
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account