Pelham — CompleteLytton, Edward Bulwer Lytton, Baron
History
Pelham — Complete
Lytton, Edward Bulwer Lytton, Baron
Adventure stories; English fiction -- 19th century; Great Britain -- History -- 19th century -- Fiction
Here we gave way to our laughter for some time, till, at last, getting
weary of the Cheltenham Cleopatra, I reminded Lady Harriett of her
promise to name to me the various personages of the assemblage.
“Eh bien,” began Lady Harriett; “d’abord, you observe that very short
person, somewhat more than inclined to enbonpoint?”
“What, that thing like a Chinese tumbler--that peg of old clothes--that
one foot square of mortality, with an aquatic-volucrine face, like a
spoonbill?”
“The very same,” said Lady Harriett, laughing; “she is a Lady Gander.
She professes to be a patroness of literature, and holds weekly soirees
in London, for all the newspaper poets. She also falls in love every
year, and then she employs her minstrels to write sonnets: her son has
a most filial tenderness for a jointure of L10,000. a-year, which she
casts away on these feasts and follies; and, in order to obtain it,
declares the good lady to be insane. Half of her friends he has bribed,
or persuaded, to be of his opinion: the other half stoutly maintain her
rationality; and, in fact, she herself is divided in her own opinion as
to the case; for she is in the habit of drinking to a most unsentimental
excess, and when the fit of intoxication is upon her, she confesses to
the charge brought against her--supplicates for mercy and brandy, and
totters to bed with the air of a Magdalene; but when she recovers the
next morning, the whole scene is changed; she is an injured woman, a
persecuted saint, a female Sophocles--declared to be mad only because
she is a miracle. Poor Harry Darlington called upon her in town, the
other day; he found her sitting in a large chair, and surrounded by a
whole host of hangers-on, who were disputing by no means sotto voce,
whether Lady Gander was mad or not? Henry was immediately appealed
to:--‘Now, is not this a proof of insanity?’ said one.--‘Is not this
a mark of compos mentis?’ cried another. ‘I appeal to you, Mr.
Darlington,’ exclaimed all. Meanwhile the object of the conversation
sate in a state of maudlin insensibility, turning her head, first on one
side, and then on the other; and nodding to all the disputants, as if
agreeing with each. But enough of her. Do you observe that lady in--”
“Good heavens!” exclaimed I, starting up, “is that--can that be
Tyrrell?”
“What’s the matter with the man?” cried Lady Harriett.
I quickly recovered my presence of mind, and reseated myself: “Pray
forgive me, Lady Harriett,” said I; “but I think, nay, I am sure, I see
a person I once met under very particular circumstances. Do you observe
that dark man in deep mourning, who has just entered the room, and is
now speaking to Sir Ralph Rumford?”
“I do, it is Sir John Tyrrell!” replied Lady Harriett: “he only came to
Cheltenham yesterday. His is a very singular history.”
“What is it?” said I, eagerly.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account