Pen-portraits of literary women : $b by themselves and others, Volume 2 (of 2)
General
Pen-portraits of literary women : $b by themselves and others, Volume 2 (of 2)
Authors, English -- Biography; Women authors, English -- Biography
We must be careful not to found too much on _suggestions_ of character
in George Eliot’s books; and this must particularly be borne in mind
in the ‘Mill on the Floss.’ No doubt the early part of Maggie’s
portraiture is the best autobiographical representation we can have of
George Eliot’s own feelings in her childhood, and many of the incidents
in the book are based on real experiences of family life, but so mixed
with fictitious elements and situations that it would be absolutely
misleading to trust to it as a true history. The writing of ‘Romola’
ploughed into her more than any of her other books. She told me she
could put her finger on it as marking a well-defined transition in
her life. In her own words, “I began it a young woman--I finished it
an old woman.” She told me that, in all that she considered her best
writing, there was a “not herself,” which took possession of her, and
that she felt her own personality to be merely the instrument through
which this spirit, as it were, was acting. Particularly she dwelt on
this in regard to the scene in ‘Middlemarch’ between Dorothea and
Rosamond, saying that, although she always knew they had, sooner or
later, to come together, she kept the idea resolutely out of her mind
until Dorothea was in Rosamond’s drawing-room. Then, abandoning herself
to the inspiration of the moment, she wrote the whole scene exactly
as it stands, without alteration or erasure, in an intense state of
excitement and agitation, feeling herself entirely possessed by the
feelings of the two women. Of all the characters she had attempted
she found Rosamond’s the most difficult to sustain. With this sense of
“possession” it is easy to imagine what the cost to the author must
have been of writing books, each of which has its tragedy.
J. W. CROSS: ‘George Eliot’s Life.’
* * * * *
[Sidenote: Her MSS.]
George Eliot was the most careful and accurate among authors. Her
beautifully written manuscript, free from blur or erasure, and with
every letter delicately and distinctly finished, was only the outward
and visible sign of the inward labor which she had taken to work
out her ideas. She never drew any of her facts or impressions from
second-hand; and thus, in spite of the number and variety of her
illustrations, she had rarely much to correct in her proof-sheets. She
had all that love of doing her work well for the work’s sake, which she
makes a prominent characteristic of ‘Adam Bede,’ and ‘Stradivarius.’
---- ----: ‘George Eliot,’ _Blackwood’s Magazine_, February, 1881.
* * * * *
[Sidenote: Inscriptions on MSS.]
The manuscript of ‘Adam Bede’ bears the following inscription: “To
my dear husband, George Henry Lewes, I give the MS. of a work which
would never have been written but for the happiness which his love has
conferred on my life.”
The manuscript of ‘The Mill on the Floss’ bears the following
inscription:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account