Civilization, Western -- Fiction; France -- Civilization -- Fiction; Penguins -- Fiction; Satire
Madame Clarence, the widow of an exalted functionary of the Republic,
loved to entertain. Every Thursday she collected together some friends
of modest condition who took pleasure in conversation. The ladies who
went to see her, very different in age and rank, were all without
money, and had all suffered much. There was a duchess who looked like a
fortune-teller and a fortune-teller who looked like a duchess. Madame
Clarence was pretty enough to maintain some old _liaisons_, but not to
form new ones, and she generally inspired a quiet esteem. She had a
very pretty daughter, who, since she had no dower, caused some alarm
among the male guests; for the Penguins were as much afraid of
portionless girls as they were of the devil himself. Eveline Clarence,
noticing their reserve and perceiving its cause, used to hand them
their tea with an air of disdain. Moreover, she seldom appeared at the
parties and talked only to the ladies or the very young people. Her
discreet and retiring presence put no restraint upon the conversation,
since those who took part in it thought either that as she was a young
girl she would not understand it, or that, being twenty-five years old,
she might listen to everything.
One Thursday therefore, in Madame Clarence’s drawing-room, the
conversation turned upon love. The ladies spoke of it with pride,
delicacy, and mystery, the men with discretion and fatuity; everyone
took an interest in the conversation, for each one was interested in
what he or she said. A great deal of wit flowed; brilliant apostrophes
were launched forth and keen repartees were returned. But when
Professor Haddock began to speak he overwhelmed everybody.
“It is the same with our ideas on love as with our ideas on everything
else,” said he, “they rest upon anterior habits whose very memory has
been effaced. In morals, the limitations that have lost their grounds
for existing, the most useless obligations, the cruelest and most
injurious restraints, are because of their profound antiquity and the
mystery of their origin, the least disputed and the least disputable as
well as the most respected, and they are those that cannot be violated
without incurring the most severe blame. All morality relative to the
relations of the sexes is founded on this principle: that a woman once
obtained belongs to the man, that she is his property like his horse or
his weapons. And this having ceased to be true, absurdities result from
it, such as the marriage or contract of sale of a woman to a man, with
clauses restricting the right of ownership introduced as a consequence
of the gradual diminution of the claims of the possessor.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account