By this contrivance it is most evidently proved to those who
are totally unacquainted with the theory, that weights do not
preponderate in compound engines on account of their distance
from the center. Several contrivances may be made to the same
effect. The following combination of wheel-work presented
itself to me as one which would most probably be mistaken for a
perpetual motion. (Fig. 2, plate 15.) The five circles represent
the same number of wheels of equal diameter and number of teeth,
acting together. The middle wheel A is fixed between two upright
pillars, so that it cannot revolve. The other four wheels are
pinned in a frame H I, in which they can revolve, and through
which the axis of A likewise passes. From the extremity of the
axis of D, and also of _d_, proceed the horizontal levers H K and
I L, which are equal, and point in the same direction parallel
to the plane of the wheels. At the extremity of these arms hang
the equal weights P and _p_. Let it now be imagined that the
end I of the frame is depressed, the wheel B will turn round by
the reaction of the fixed wheel A in the same direction as H I,
and it will make one revolution in the same time relative to
the frame, or two with regard to absolute space, by reason of
its being carried round. The action of B upon D will produce a
rotation relative to the frame in the opposite direction during
the same time. Instead, therefore, of two revolutions like the
wheel B, this wheel D, with regard to absolute space, will not
revolve at all, and in every position of the apparatus the arm
I L will continue horizontal, and point the same way. For similar
reasons the arm H K will retain its position. Consequently, it is
seen that the descending weight will move at a great horizontal
distance from the center N, while the ascending weight rises
very near that center. But there will, not on this account,
be a perpetual motion: for the action of the levers H K and
I L upon the frame H I, by means of the toothed wheels, will,
in the detail, be found precisely alike, and in the general
consideration of the motions of P and _p_, the opposite motions
in the circle E F G will be accurately the same.
[Illustration]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account