These being the conditions, I say that the gnomon A B C will
revolve from C to H and towards I, thence will return to C,
thence to H as before, and so on perpetually. The cause of this
continual motion is the forcible suspension; for the whole gnomon
preponderates in C on account of the perpendicular tangent B A;
which effect becomes more marked if a globe of iron S be supposed
suspended at C. As therefore the whole of this mass, as well
from the supports of the balance as from the momentary diameter,
hangs suspended at C, and the vertex A, on account of the firm
beam D E, cannot fall from the centre of the universe; it comes
to pass that all points as well of the globe S, as of the gnomon
A B C, with a continual motion turn round A; but because, by the
line B A in the fixed point A, they are held from falling to the
centre; therefore the greatest force of that tendency is exerted
in the line B, and induces it to inclination; which inclination
on account of the continuous solidity of the gnomon cannot be
at all abated, so that the whole impetus is exerted either at
the point A about the movable beam or at the movable poles of
the beam D and E; which poles being free in their sockets D and
E, abandon themselves to the motion of Nature, and thus do not
in any wise hinder a perpetual circular motion. What indeed is
self-evident in this, reason confirms, and daily experience in
statics manifests. For if a short gnomon stand either on the
terrestrial superficies M N, O P, or Q R; it will always fall
towards the part C, or N, by the preponderating portion M K C;
which is manifested in daily experiments.
Thence it is evident that if the gnomon were entire, the force
which it exerts at N would pass into the line B A still hanging
over the centre. And this is one argument. The other is from
the contrary. For if an equal and similar gnomon were attached
towards the part D, then the whole mass hanging on its centre
would remain in equilibrium and there would be no motion;
consequently the one half being taken away, the other would
necessarily move according to the laws and experience of statics.
If the shortened gnomon M B C N were bound only to the point M,
the rest being left free, it would certainly revolve, and in the
same case, the point C would describe almost a semicircular arc
till, coming down to a perpendicular position, it would there
remain.
Now as the force of the entire gnomon falls in the vertex A,
there would be an entire and perpetual revolution around A. Much
more would this be the case if on the centre C stood either the
small curve A C L A or the larger one A K C, or finally the globe
S alone, hanging from two iron rods A B and B C, or from one
arc, A N C. From this, therefore, it may be demonstrated that a
perpetual circular motion is possible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account