It is puerile in the extreme to be foretelling defeat when
so many other objects may be gained by the highly laudable
pursuit, perhaps of greater advantage to society at large than
the discovery in question. * * * In a word, were the perpetual
motion discovered tomorrow, it would be wise of all the
governments of the world to offer a very high reward for some
species of discovery that would be universally sought after,
although it might never be found out. * * * The effects of
industry are--enlargement of the mind, accumulation of knowledge,
and rendering ourselves ignorant of the torments which idleness
and dulness always engender. * * * In the next place, there
are no solid grounds for the assertion that the discovery of
a perpetual motion is an impossibility. In the present state
of human knowledge respecting the powers of nature, it is not
demonstrable one way or another. * * * The study of what relates
to the perpetual motion has this great advantage, that it
directs to the discovery of error as well as of truth; whereas,
what are they which are called truths of science at present but
vacillating human opinions, or erroneous assumptions of what
we call natural causes? What are they but such as consist in
mere assumption, sanctioned by time, and admitted by existing
authorities in science, and of course generally acquiesced in,
without previous investigation?
So far, then, from being guided in our decision respecting what
is possible by the "unerring laws of nature," by "mathematical
demonstration," and by "experimental proofs," we are continually
misled by an erroneous faith in the nonentity, attraction.
On such an imperfect knowledge of the causes of phenomena, who
should say he knows what can or what cannot be discovered?
Article From Pamphleteer
In the "Pamphleteer," published in London, the following by a
correspondent whose name we cannot give was published in March of 1822:
"A few words inducing towards the discovery of Perpetual Motion, perhaps
the actual discovery thereof:"
London, March, 1822.
What is meant by the term "Perpetual Motion?" Is it supposed
that there is an undiscovered substance in the world, that will
of itself perpetually move, with as little apparent cause as
that which actuates the needle in becoming motionless in one
particular position? Or, is it to be found in the combined
reaction of mechanical powers?
The first idea is stamped with a degree of probability, by the
mystery of the needle; yet I imagine the latter is relied on
with the greater confidence of mankind, and is the pith of the
following few words:
It is well known that the weight of a pendulum will almost regain
the level from which it descended, losing a little space at every
vibration, until it becomes motionless; if of itself it could
exceed or even regain the level, doubtless it would become a
perpetual motion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account