Plants are great inventors, and by continual experimentation have
perfected thousands of ingenious devices to help them in their life
struggles. Many of these have to do with the all-important processes
of reproduction and cross-fertilization. The elaborate organs which
oftentimes force visiting insects to aid the flowers in their
love-making are conclusive proofs of directing intelligence. If, as is
generally believed, vegetable life preceded animal life on this planet,
then the plants must have developed these special reproductive organs
in which insects act as the fertilizing agents as direct attempts to
benefit the race by cross-breeding.
While cross-fertilization is vitally necessary for the maintenance of
a vigorous and hardy stock, inbreeding either between flowers of the
same plant or even between the organs of a single bi-sexual flower is
often practiced. In the love-making of the Grass of Parnassus and the
Love in the Mist (_Nigella_), we have a very pretty and intelligent
act. The flowers are unisexual and, as the females usually grow on
much longer stalks than the males, the latter would not have much
chance of showering their pollen on their consorts, if it were not for
the fact that, at the proper season, without outside stimulation, the
“tall females bend down to their dwarf husbands.” This surely is as
intelligent and conscious as the mating of animals.
The carnivorous plants act with uncanny wisdom. The insect-devouring
Sundews pay no attention to pebbles, bits of metal, or other foreign
substances placed on their leaves, but are quick enough to sense the
nourishment to be derived from a piece of meat. Laboratory specimens
have been observed to actually reach out toward Flies pinned on cards
near them. So highstrung are these sensitive organisms that they can
be partially paralyzed if certain spots on their leaves are pricked.
Many people have no hesitancy in ascribing considerable intelligence
to the higher animals; why do they balk at making the same concession
to plants? If you concede intelligence to a single animal, you
concede _some measure_ of brain-power to all animals down to the
one-celled Amoeba, and so must grant the same favour to the plant
world. Plants and animals, besides having many habits in common,
in their simplest forms are often indistinguishable. Both reduce
themselves to single-celled masses of protoplasm. The Myxomycetes are
both so plant-like and at the same time so animal-like that their
classification “depends rather on the general philosophical position of
the observer than on facts.” Possibly they are both animal and plant at
the same time--a sort of “missing link” connecting the two kingdoms of
life.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account