Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo IIIAllies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Islamic
Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo III
Allies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Christianity and other religions -- Islam; Church history -- Middle Ages, 600-1500; Papacy; Papacy -- History
At the twelfth sitting on the 22nd March a number of writings were read
which Macarius had transmitted to the emperor, but the emperor sent on to
the Council unread. Among them were contained the letters of Sergius to
Cyrus and Honorius, and the answer of the latter. These documents were
collated with the manuscripts of the patriarchal archive, and found to
agree. Thereupon in the thirteenth session, on the 28th March,
condemnation was passed upon the heads and favourers of Monothelitism, on
Theodore of Pharan, Cyrus of Alexandria, Sergius, Pyrrhus, Paul, Peter of
Constantinople (the three patriarchs next following, of whom nothing
heretical was found, were spared), as likewise upon “Honorius of Rome, who
followed Sergius and confirmed his teaching”. The synodal letter of
Sophronius was acknowledged as orthodox. In the fourteenth session, on the
5th April, at which also the newly-elected Catholic patriarch of Antioch,
Theophanes, was present, the falsifications in the Fifth Council, the
writing ascribed to Mennas and the two suppositious letters of Vigilius,
were laid under anathema. On the octave of Easter, the 14th April, John,
bishop of Porto, celebrated Mass in the emperor’s presence at Sancta
Sophia according to the Latin rite. The monk and priest Polychronius, who
already in the fourteenth session had been accused by Domitius, bishop of
Prusias, as a deceiver of the people, was brought before the Council at
its fifteenth session on the 26th April. He desired in confirmation of the
Monothelite doctrine to raise up a dead man. He was allowed to try in
order to undeceive the people. He laid his confession of faith upon a dead
body which was brought in, and whispered for two hours long into his ears,
of course without effect. As he was not shaken in his attachment to the
heresy, he was deprived of his rank as priest, and excommunicated. In the
sixteenth session, which was held, after a long interval, on the 9th
August, a Syrian priest, Constantine of Apamea, wished to get the doctrine
recognised that there were in Christ two operations belonging to the
Natures, but only one personal Will of the Word: that besides this Christ
had once indeed also a natural human Will, but that He laid aside this at
the crucifixion together with flesh and blood. The Council condemned this
doctrine as savouring of Manichean and Apollinarian heresy, issued
anathema against those whom it condemned, and resolved to publish a
confession of faith, which was considered at the seventeenth session of
the 11th September, and solemnly proclaimed at the closing session on the
16th September, in presence of the emperor. In this, after agreement
declared with the five preceding General Councils, it was proclaimed that
there are to be received in Christ Two Natural Operations and Two Natural
Wills undivided, inseparable, unchangeable, and unmixed, which are not
contrary to each other, since the human will follows the divine and is
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account