Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo IIIAllies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Islamic
Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo III
Allies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Christianity and other religions -- Islam; Church history -- Middle Ages, 600-1500; Papacy; Papacy -- History
The Sixth Council closes a crisis of danger to the faith of the Church
than which no greater is to be found in all history. The years from 638,
in which Honorius died, to 682, in which his successor St. Leo II.
approved the doctrinal decision of the Council, and further, allowed the
conduct of a predecessor to be condemned, are occupied by ten successors
of Honorius, every one of whom with the utmost zeal condemned the heresy
which was supported by two emperors, wielding absolute power, and by four
successive patriarchs of Constantinople, besides patriarchs of Alexandria
and Antioch. All these put ecclesiastical authority at the service of
these emperors to carry out their will. Heraclius and Constans II. were
not theologians, and it required theological skill to construct concerning
the Person of our Lord a heresy which could present itself to the
fastidious Greek mind, clothed in proper expressions of a language lending
itself with unsurpassable accuracy to every variation of thought. Cyrus,
made for his first suggestions, by the grateful monarch, patriarch of
Alexandria, was so good as to provide Heraclius with doctrinal decrees
intended to make the disloyal sects of Egypt believe that they could
express their own false doctrine in words which might pass for an assent
to the Council of Chalcedon and the doctrine of St. Leo. When the
patriarch Sophronius denounced the error and appealed to Rome and Pope
Honorius in words which after twelve hundred years sound like a trumpet’s
call, Sergius being patriarch of Constantinople, the bosom friend and most
trusted counsellor of Heraclius, holding the see of the Golden City for
eight and twenty years, living and dying, too, in the greatest renown as
an orthodox bishop, approached Pope Honorius with insidious language,
totally disguising the real state of things in the East. He wished the
Pope to believe that Cyrus of Alexandria was winning the proud and
tumultuous sects of Egypt to Catholic union with the doctrine of St. Leo,
which Honorius held with the utmost fidelity. Not only did he write
letters, but he constructed a document to which he induced the emperor to
set the imperial seal and require it to be signed by all bishops, and
especially by the bishop of Rome. The document was intended to introduce
that heresy formulated by Cyrus, which Sophronius exposed and refuted.
Pope Honorius died in October 638, and never saw this document. Sergius
got it passed by his Council at Constantinople, but died himself in
December of the same year. Pope Severinus was elected to succeed Honorius
before the end of the year 638, but his consecration was delayed by Greek
intrigues for nineteen months, in the hope of obtaining his assent to the
document drawn up by Sergius. This was found to be hopeless. The exarch
then contented himself with plundering the Lateran treasury. Pope
Severinus was at length consecrated, and sat for two months and six days,
in which time however he condemned the Ecthesis.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account