Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo IIIAllies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Islamic
Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo III
Allies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Christianity and other religions -- Islam; Church history -- Middle Ages, 600-1500; Papacy; Papacy -- History
Whatever pomp and glory remained to the empire was centered in
Constantinople. Rome and the Pope were powerless as to material strength.
So St. Martin, when accused at his trial of favouring an enemy of the
emperor, replied: “What was I to resist an exarch, without any force of my
own?” At that time Constantinople was probably the greatest as well as the
richest city in the world. When Constans II. eight years after visited
Rome he swept away whatever works of art pleased him for the further
adornment of his capital. In the four centuries down to Leo III. which
elapsed since the consecration of the capital by its founder, every
successor had made it a point of honour to improve the beauty and increase
the strength of the imperial residence.
Thus those twenty-four Popes from the first to the second Gregory were
dwelling in a Rome which continued to exist only as the seat of their own
primacy, drawing successive generations to it, and visited year by year
through the pilgrims who came to it from all parts of the world, since
they sought the tomb of the chief apostle when the sepulchre of the Master
was enthralled by the Saracen. Beside that tomb they stood with Roman
fortitude against Byzantine fluctuation. Heraclius published an Ecthesis,
and Constans II. a Typus. Ten Popes condemned both, and then Constantine
IV. humbly admitted that both were worthless. He further undid the heresy
of four successive patriarchs by putting them under anathema. He received
as the living Peter the successor of one whom his father had stolen from
Rome and martyred in the Crimea; just as his son Justinian fell at the
feet of Pope Constantine, after he had tried to repeat the crime of his
grandfather Constans on the person of Pope Sergius. So in 680 Theodore,
then patriarch of Constantinople, urged on by another patriarch who lived
at Constantinople since his own Antioch was become a spoil of the Saracen,
expunged from the diptychs the names of all the Popes after Honorius to
his own time. Theodore was himself deposed while the Sixth Council sat,
and Macarius, his adviser, was deposed by that Council, but Theodore lived
to be restored and to die as patriarch with a sounder faith than he had
shown at the beginning. It is remarkable that after the four Monothelite
patriarchs, Sergius, Pyrrhus, Paul, and Peter, who were condemned at the
Sixth Council, three patriarchs, Thomas II., 667-8, John V., 669-674, and
Constantine I., 674-6,(163) “leant to orthodoxy,” and so escaped the
censure of the Council, while Theodore was heretical from 678 to 680, and
orthodox when restored from 683 to 686.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account