Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo IIIAllies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Islamic
Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo III
Allies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Christianity and other religions -- Islam; Church history -- Middle Ages, 600-1500; Papacy; Papacy -- History
I will here insert the judgment of another historian, upon the gift of the
exarchate, made by Pipin to St. Peter, in the person of the Popes:—(221)
“To question the rightness of this donation is unreasonable and
preposterous. Since the reconquest of Italy by Belisarius and Narses, Rome
was regarded at Constantinople simply as a province, not as a member of
the realm, or not as, what it had originally been, the seat of empire. On
what could the right of Greek tyrants be founded constantly to receive
back, even at second hand, conquests which they were able neither to
govern nor to maintain? The assertions of some late historical writers
seem to pre-suppose that all Europe, as far as the Rhine and the Danube,
were placed by God for ever under the Byzantine yoke, and that the shaking
off this yoke was an unpardonable injustice. Rome did under her bishops
what peoples did under their kings. Rome took her opportunity to free
herself from the yoke of foreign dominion and unnatural relations. No
prince, no people of Europe has any other claim upon its soil to show than
this and the centuries. Both tell for Rome. Before this testimony, the
lesser but yet valid right disappears, that the Greek emperor had
confiscated the Papal possessions situated in Lower Italy, and that
nothing was more natural than that it should take the compensation which
presented itself. The other question which has been also proposed, whether
the office of a teacher and bishop of the Christian community can be
united with a secular administration, had been long before answered. _Rome
owed its actual existence solely to the protection of its bishops._ They
had found their best right of sovereignty in the gratitude of the people,
and long before the donation of Ravenna, they had been, if not in name,
yet in fact, princes in Rome.”
At the beginning of the year 756, Aistulf, the most aggressive of Lombard
kings, had strictly invested Rome, ravaged its campagna, and destroyed the
churches therein, while he devoutly exhumed the bodies of martyrs to
transport them to new shrines in Pavia. In the spring of that year he
surrendered his capital to the king of the Franks, and submitted to all
the conditions imposed on him by Pipin. In the autumn, by a sudden stroke
of God, he died out hunting. At the beginning of the year 757, Desiderius,
by the help of the Pope, Stephen II. had succeeded to the Lombard throne,
itself spared by Pipin, and these great changes are recorded in an extant
letter of Pope Stephen, a hymn of gratitude and praise, to Pipin, who had
placed the keys of the recovered cities, forming the new created State of
the Church, on the tomb of St. Peter. Great is the contrast between the
letters of 756, written to Pipin, in the height of Rome’s distress and
danger, and this letter from the first Pope-king to his benefactor.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account