Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo IIIAllies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Islamic
Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo III
Allies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Christianity and other religions -- Islam; Church history -- Middle Ages, 600-1500; Papacy; Papacy -- History
Sophronius(56) addressing his colleagues began with regretting that he was
advanced to the pontifical throne from a very humble state against his
will. Begging his fathers and brethren to support him, he noted that it
was an apostolic custom throughout the world that they who were thus
advanced, should attest their faith to the colleagues preceding them.
After this introduction, Sophronius threw his words into the form of a
creed, in which the first part dwelt upon the Trinity. He then, at greater
length, set forth his belief in the Incarnation. How God the Son, taking
pity upon the fall of man, by His own will, and the will of His Father,
and the divine good pleasure of the Spirit, being of the infinite nature,
incapable of circumscription and of local passage, entered the virginal
womb, resplendent in its purity, of Mary the holy, the God-minded, the
free from every contamination of body, of soul, and of mind;(57) the
fleshless took flesh, the formless, in His divine substance, took our
form; the eternal God becomes in truth man. He, who is in the bosom of the
eternal Father is bosomed in a mother’s womb. He who is without time
receives a beginning in time. Then, passing to the point in question, he
went on: Christ is One and Two, One in Person, Two in Natures and their
natural attributes. On this account, One and the same Christ and Son, and
Only-begotten is found undivided in both natures. He worked physically the
works of each nature according to the essential quality or natural
property which belonged to each. This He could not have done, had He
possessed, as One only Person, so One only Nature, not compounded. For
then, the One and the Same would not have completely done the works of
each Nature. For when has Godhead without body worked naturally the works
of the body? or, when has a body without Godhead worked works which
substantially belong to the Godhead? But Emmanuel, being One, and in this
Oneness both, that is, God and Man, did, in truth, the works of each
Nature; being One and the Same, as God He did the divine, as Man the human
works. Being One and the Same, He works and He speaks the divine and the
human.(58) Not one wrought miracles, and another did human works, and
suffered pains, as Nestorius meant, but one and the same Christ and Son
wrought the divine and the human according to each, as St. Cyril taught.
In each of the Two Natures He had the two powers unmingled, but undivided.
As He is eternal God, He wrought the miracles; as He was Man in the last
times, He wrought the inferior and human works.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account