Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo IIIAllies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Islamic
Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo III
Allies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Christianity and other religions -- Islam; Church history -- Middle Ages, 600-1500; Papacy; Papacy -- History
Was the blow to the empire equally a blow to the Church? The severance of
provinces so vast, so populous, so rich in natural productions, from
Heraclius, was in itself depriving the lord of the world of legs and arms;
but more dangerous than any material privation was the setting up an
empire with a definite creed, in which religious conquest was by far the
most powerful ingredient. The war-cry, “There is no God but God, and
Mohammed is his prophet,” meant the earth and all that is in it, its
fruits, and above all, its women, belong entirely to the followers of
Mohammed. They who do not either become his, or pay tribute to him, have
no rights. Their children become slaves, their wives and daughters
captive. These begin to be the absolute possession of the Mohammedan
conqueror; if he dies in battle, rewards of martyrdom, so won, for his
successors: if he lives, adornments of his life, which he pleases God by
accepting.
As to the treatment of Christian countries, Omar, in the capture of
Jerusalem, had supplied a rule and standard which for the present was
followed at least in profession. Christians were not treated as idolaters:
they were taken into covenant. We are told that the tribute was so
moderate that the first Egyptians and Syrians who accepted it, thought
that they had made a favourable transfer of themselves from Byzantine to
Mohammedan lordship.(69) The Byzantine had perpetually interfered with
their religious convictions, and domineered over their ecclesiastical
appointments. Mohammedans, in the disdain of superior power resting on
their exclusive possession of truth, kept entirely aloof. Once their own
lordship established and acknowledged, they allowed their subjects a
certain freedom of action within the lines of Omar’s covenant. It is
probable that they began by so doing, nor is it easy to account for the
rapid and continued submission of provinces, such as Syria and Egypt,
without the willingness of their inhabitants to accept the change be taken
into account. But it is certain that the Christian religion drooped more
and more under the shadow of Mohammedan domination.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account