Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo IIIAllies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Islamic
Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo III
Allies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Christianity and other religions -- Islam; Church history -- Middle Ages, 600-1500; Papacy; Papacy -- History
And here not only is the fall of the three patriarchates under conquerors
who strive to destroy the Christian faith to be noted as following upon
two centuries of incessant heresy, but another divine judgment also. No
sooner have the three patriarchs lost their original position, the two
elder as second and third bishops of the whole Church in virtue of their
descent from Peter, and taken definitively a position subordinate to the
upstart at Byzantium, who in the last decade of the fifth century, in the
time of Pope Gelasius, was proclaimed in his Council at Rome no patriarch
at all, than they fall under a domination which is not merely infidel but
antichristian. The aim of the chalifate is to supplant Christ by Mohammed.
The patriarchs, who accepted as superior one who rose above them simply
because he was bishop of the imperial residence, had from that time
forward to live under a despot who reigned in the name of the false
prophet. From being subjects of the Greek Basileus, who, by means of the
bishop exalted by him in successive generations, strove to hamper in the
exercise of his office the successor of St. Peter, even to the point of
making him subject to the guidance of the Byzantine crown in spiritual
matters, which was the meaning of the Ecthesis of Heraclius, they passed
to be subjects of the Mohammedan chalif, who claimed the supremacy of both
powers in the name of the falsehood just invented.
In the diminished territory of Byzantium, which during the rest of the
century after Heraclius could but just keep the Mohammedan conqueror
outside its walls, the bishop of the royal residence became in fact the
sole patriarch. Sergius and Pyrrhus, Paul and Peter, the first four of
those so exalted, were branded as heretics by the Sixth Council. Those who
still bore the names of Alexandria, Antioch, and Jerusalem appeared at
times, or were deemed to appear, at a Byzantine Council, but the hundred
bishops of the Alexandrine, and the hundred and sixty bishops of the
Antiochene waned and wasted more and more with every generation miserably
spent under the absolute rule of the Prophet’s chalif, who had for
Christians only two modes of treatment, the one a noxious patronage of
their heresy, if such prevailed; the other, persecution of their faith, if
they were faithful and zealous.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account