Pharmacologia: Fourth American, from the Seventh London EditionParis, John Ayrton
Science
Pharmacologia: Fourth American, from the Seventh London Edition
Paris, John Ayrton
Pharmacognosy; Pharmacology; Pharmacy
acid cannot communicate solubility; the mercury, therefore, existing in
the circulating mass, when brought in the course of the circulation to
the secreting vessels of the kidneys, will not pass through their whole
course; but if conveyed so far as to be combined with _phosphoric acid_,
will, from this combination, be incapable of being conveyed onwards, and
will therefore be retained in the composition of that part of the blood
which does not enter into the secretion, but returns into the
circulation. It must be discharged by some other emunctory; a portion of
it appears, from some facts, to pass off by the insensible perspiration;
but the _tenuity_ of this secretion, if the term may be employed, must
be unfavourable to this mode of discharge. The salivary secretion is one
by which it may be more easily transmitted; and this transmission may
even be facilitated by the affinity exerted to the _Oxide of Mercury_ by
the _Muriatic Acid_, the _Soda_, and _Ammonia_, which are the chief
saline ingredients in saliva; for it deserves to be remarked that triple
compounds of these substances are, to a certain extent, soluble in
water; and if the _Mercury_ is thus secreted, it will of course
stimulate the secreting vessels through which it passes, and increase
the discharge.
Sir Gilbert Blane[168] has lately advanced another hypothesis to account
for the effects of mercury as a sialogogue; he considers the salivary
glands as one of the outlets for the _ramenta_ of the bones, for by
analysing the saliva we discover the principles of which they consist;
indeed the osseous matter not unfrequently concretes on the teeth, and
sometimes on the salivary ducts, in the form of what is called _Tartar:_
“does not this fact,” says Sir Gilbert Blane, “in some measure account
for these glands being the parts upon which determination is made by the
operation of mercury, which consists in exciting an active absorption of
solid parts, as I have elsewhere observed?”[169]
But do not the kidneys, and other excretory glands also furnish outlets,
through which the _detritus_ of the body is eliminated. How does it
happen, therefore, that the kidneys are not as equally affected as the
salivary glands by the action of mercury? In the present state of our
knowledge it will be more prudent to rest on the phenomenon as an
ultimate fact, than in attempting to ascend higher in the scale of
causes, to involve ourselves in impenetrable darkness.
During the prevalence of the theory which attributed to _Nitric acid_
all the antisyphilitic powers of mercury, it was even maintained that
this acid also excited ptyalism; experience however has disproved the
effects thus attributed to it, and no one attempts to support its
pretensions, as a sialogogue, except indeed as it may perchance, by its
acrid qualities, influence the excretory ducts of the glands,
externally, in the act of being swallowed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account