Pharmacologia: Fourth American, from the Seventh London EditionParis, John Ayrton
Science
Pharmacologia: Fourth American, from the Seventh London Edition
Paris, John Ayrton
Pharmacognosy; Pharmacology; Pharmacy
But there remains for our investigation a still more important
precaution respecting this law of medicinal combination;—that, in
combining substances in the manner, and for the object just related, the
practitioner should be well satisfied that their medicinal virtues are
in reality _practically_ SIMILAR, or he will fall into an error of the
most fatal tendency; it has been already shewn, and I hope I shall not
be considered tedious by again directing the reader’s attention to the
fact, that medicines are not necessarily similar because they have been
arranged in the same artificial division of remedies; in order to
establish a perfect similarity _their operations must be found by
experience to continue similar under every condition of the human body;
and that, moreover, they must owe such similarity to modes of operation
which are compatible with each other, and consonant with the general
mode of cure_; we have only to refer to the history of Diuretics (_page
92_) for a full illustration of this important truth; thus _Squill_,
_Calomel_, and _Digitalis_, are each powerful Diuretics, but
nevertheless they cannot be considered _similar_ remedies, since
_Digitalis_ will entirely fail in its effects in the very cases that
_Calomel and Squill_ succeed; and _Squill_ will prove inert when
_Digitalis_ is capable of producing the most powerful influence; this
arises from their modes of operation being dissimilar, and consequently
requiring for their success such different states of the living system.
_Squill_, it will be seen, acts _primarily_ on the urinary organs, by
stimulating the secreting vessels of the kidneys; _Mercury_, on the
contrary, acts primarily on the absorbents, and _secondarily_ on the
kidneys; whereas _Digitalis_ produces its effects by diminishing
arterial action, and increasing that of absorption.
Dr. Blackall, in his “Observations upon the Cure of Dropsies,” has
offered some remarks so valuable in themselves, and so illustrative of
this important subject, that I shall take leave to quote the passage.
“Many physicians,” he observes, “are fond of combining _Squill_,
_Calomel_, and _Digitalis_, as a diuretic in dropsy; a practice unsafe,
and not very decidedly possessing the merit even of being consistent.
_Digitalis_ greatly depresses the action of the heart and arteries, and
controls the circulation, and it seems most unreasonable to believe that
its curative powers can be independent of such an effect; on the other
hand, _Mercury_, if it does not pass off quickly, is always exciting
fever, and raising and hardening the pulse; speaking from experience,
where the urine is coaguable, and _Digitalis_ agrees, both the others
are, often at least, positively injurious. On the contrary, where the
urine is foul, and not coaguable, and _Squills_ with _Calomel_ render
service, I have on that very account, made less trial of Digitalis, and
cannot therefore speak of it from much experience.” See _Form. 103_, and
the _note_ thereon.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account