Massinger, Philip, 1583-1640 -- Criticism and interpretation
A. H. C.: Massinger can be traced at the beginning of Act I., 1 and in Act
III., 1 and Act IV., 5. The resemblances are rather slight, and it is
possible that they are due to the fact that Fletcher occasionally imitated
Massinger.
17. _The Lover’s Progress._ (Massinger and Fletcher.)
M.: Act I., 1, 2 (to “Enter Malefort”); Act II., 2; Act III., 4, 6 (last
two speeches); Act IV.; Act V.
A. H. B. thinks it is “by Fletcher, with large alterations by Massinger.”
He refers to the explicit statement in the Prologue where the reviser
declares himself to be—
ambitious that it should be known
What’s good was Fletcher’s, and what ill his own,
a statement in harmony with Massinger’s well-known modesty.
A. H. C.: Massinger wrote Act I., 1, Act II., 2. There are traces of his
work in Act III., 4, 6; Act IV., 2, 4; Act V., 1, 3. The improbabilities
of the plot—_e.g._, the action of Clarangé—are due to Fletcher. It is
clear from the Prologue that the original play was too long. Massinger
probably cut it down, by leaving out, among other things, scenes in which
Lisander killed his two foes. The play is probably to be identified with
_The __ Wandering Lovers_ or _The Picture_, entered as by Massinger in the
Stationers’ Register, September 9th, 1653.
18. _The Spanish Curate._ (Massinger and Fletcher.)
M.: Act I.; Act III., 3; Act IV., 1, 4; Act V., 1, 3.
A. H. B. agrees.
Macaulay adds Act IV., 2 to Massinger.
A. H. C.: Massinger can be clearly traced in Act I., 1, Act V., 1; not in
Act V., 3. The trial scene (Act III, 3), though on slighter lines than he
uses as a rule, may be due to him.
19. _The Fair Maid of the Inn._ (Massinger and Fletcher.)
M.: Act I.; Act III., 2; Act V., 3.
A. H. B. attributes to Rowley and Massinger, and thinks Fletcher’s share
very small.
Macaulay assigns to “Massinger and another (not Fletcher).”
A. H. C.: Massinger wrote Act I., Act V., 3 as far as Clarissa’s speech.
Fletcher wrote Act II., Act III., Act IV., Act V., 1, 2. The mother’s
device to save her son is the sort of improbability from which Fletcher
does not shrink.
20. _A Very Woman._ (Massinger and Fletcher.)
M.: Act I.; Act II., 1, 2, 3 down to “Enter Pedro”; Act IV., 1, 3.
A. H. B. identifies this play with _The Woman’s Plot_, acted at Court in
1621. In its present state it is a version of a play by Fletcher, revised
for a revival by Massinger in 1634.
Macaulay assigns Act III. and Act IV., 1, 2, 3 to Fletcher. For a
discussion of this play _cf._ pp. 129-131.
21. _The Second Maiden’s Tragedy._ (Massinger, Tourneur.)
M.: Act I., Act II.
In _Eng. Stud._, ix. 234, Boyle, with some hesitation, regards this play
as “an early, anonymous, and unsuccessful attempt of Massinger’s.” Whoever
wrote it, the work is immature.
A. H. C. I find no trace of Massinger in this play, but a great deal of
Tourneur’s manner. _Cf._ Appendix XIII.
22. _Love’s Cure._ (Massinger and (?) Middleton.)
M.: Act I.; Act IV.; Act V., 1, 2.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account