Philochristus: Memoirs of a Disciple of the LordAbbott, Edwin Abbott
Religion
Philochristus: Memoirs of a Disciple of the Lord
Abbott, Edwin Abbott
Christian fiction; Jesus Christ -- Fiction
Now, looking back, I seem to discern a reason for our ignorance, or, at
the least, a certain wholesome fruit springing therefrom. For methinks,
had we known the Lord Jesus as he was, and all his greatness and glory,
and all that was to betide him, and his resurrection, and his ascension,
even then when he sat with us at meat, and went in and out with us
throughout the villages of Galilee; I say, had we known even then that
Jesus was to be raised from the dead, and to sit at the right hand of God,
methinks we could not have loved him so dearly, nor have spoken with him
so familiarly, nor have questioned him so freely, revealing unto him all
our infirmities, and trusting him as a friend, yea, loving him as a very
son of man, even one of ourselves.
But the Lord so ordained it that we should come to Jesus as to a great and
good man, becoming infected with his spirit and imbued with the love of
him as of a mortal being; and then, when he had caught our hearts as it
were by guile, so that he had made himself now needful unto us even as the
very breath of our lives, then began he to say unto us, “Whom say ye that
I, the Son of man, am?” And lo, trying our hearts, we began to perceive
that this same Son of man, who had so given life to our souls, could be
none other than the very Son of the Living God.
Hence it came to pass that, when he departed from us, and when we felt a
void in our hearts, and when we questioned ourselves what it was that we
had lost, and what it was that we most loved and trusted and revered, yea
also, and what it was that we most worshipped as divine; then behold,
searching our hearts, we found that there was nothing in heaven above nor
in the earth beneath, nor in the waters under the earth, no, nor in the
host above the heavens, that could compare with Jesus of Nazareth. And so
it was that, when we worshipped him as the Son, it seemed not unto us as
if we were honouring him by calling him God; but (if I may speak as a
child) it seemed rather as though we were striving to honour God by saying
that God was one with Jesus. For saying this, seemed all one with saying
that God was Love.
Therefore if any put this question unto me, “Why believest thou not that
Romulus is God, and Liber, and Amphiaraus, and Elias, and Enoch (who all
are said to have escaped death), and yet thou believest that Jesus of
Nazareth is God?”: my answer is this, that I believe Jesus to be God,
first, because God is Love, and Jesus is Love; secondly, because God is
Might and Jesus is Might; and lastly, because, if Jesus was not indeed
divine, then must he needs have been a poor deluded creature, unfit and
unable to do any great work for the children of men. For certainly, albeit
he was the most humble and lowly of men, yet did he ever speak of himself,
not as one of many redeemers, but as the redeemer of men, the refuge of
the wretched, the forgiver of sins, the source of life and truth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account