Măhătwah (_Sans._) Might (_Eng._) M.a.d, “Might,” (_Heb._)—Rosha, Rāga (_Sans._) Rage (_Eng._) R.g.z (_Heb._)—Kupam, A Receptacle, (_Sans._) Coop (_Eng._) K.ph.ts, To shut, close up, contract, (_Heb._)—Duhitr (_Sans._) Daughter (_Eng._) Dochter (_Scotch._) D.g, To multiply, (_Heb._) Tek-os, Progeny; Tek-on, Bringing forth, (_Greek._)—Shringa (_Sans._) Horn (_Eng._) Cornu (_Lat._) K.r.n (_Heb._)—Āpăt, A Calamity, (_Sans._) Ab.ad.n, Destruction, (_Heb._)—Bălăwān, Powerful, (_Sans._) B.o.l, A Master, to have power, (_Heb._) “Baal,” i.e. The Ruler, name of an idol.—Shira, The Head, (_Sans._) Sh.r, A Prince, A Ruler, (_Heb._)—Ghăshăti (_Sans._) Gusheth (_Eng._) G.sh.m, To rain, A violent Shower, (_Heb._) “Geesers,” Fountains of Hot Water in Iceland.—Grŭshta (_Sans._) Grist (_Eng._) G.r.s, To break, crush to pieces, Wheat beaten out, (_Heb._)—Torati (_Sans._) Teareth, Tore, (_Eng._) T.r.ph, To tear off, To tear to pieces, (_Heb._) Tori (_Welsh_.)—Diyati (_Sans._) Dieth (_Eng._) Dee.e, Blackness of colour,(102) (_Heb._) Dee.ou.a, The Devil, (_Syriac_.) Dee.ou.v, Ink, (_Heb._) Dee, Black, (_Welsh_.)—Pesati (_Sans._) Paceth (_Eng._) Psh.o, To pass, a pace, (_Heb._)—Rănăti (_Sans._) Runneth (_Eng._) R.n (_Heb._)—Shara (_Sans._) Gar. Arrow (_Ang.-Sax._) Sh.r.ee.e, A Dart, (_Heb._)—Shatati (_Sans._) Shutteth; Sheath, (_Eng._) S.th.m, To stop up, hide, conceal, S.th.ce.m.e, A Secret, (_Heb._) Stum, Dumb, (_Ger._) It must be quite evident that in these examples the affinity in _words_ between the Hebrew and the Indo-European languages is as close as that which exists among those languages themselves. The difference of grammatical forms has been much insisted upon. This ground, where it occurs, has already been proved to afford no evidence of a remote difference of race. (See p. 89.) But in treating of the North American Indian dialects, I shall show that no such grammatical difference does exist in this instance, the Hebrew pronouns, which are the basis of its grammar, being identical with those of the Welsh,(103) now considered to be a member of the Indo-European group of tongues. CHAPTER V. IDENTITY OF THE EGYPTIANS WITH THE INDIANS, JEWS, AND OTHER BRANCHES OF THE HUMAN RACE. SECTION I. _Identity of the ancient Indian and Egyptian Mythology, &c. Names of the Egyptian Gods, significant in the Hebrew and Indo-European Tongues. Dr. Lepsius’s comments on Champollion’s opinion that the Modern Egyptian does not differ from the Egyptian of the oldest Monuments. Proofs of changes. Proofs from Language that the origin of the Egyptians cannot be referred to the very remote date fixed by some writers. Causes of the primitive features of the Hebrew and the Sanscrit. Identity of Sanscrit and Scriptural account of the Creation and of the Origin of the Human Race. Sir William Jones’s explanation of this coincidence. High antiquity of the Indian Vedas._