Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part I. For the year 1757.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world.Various
History
Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part I. For the year 1757.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world.
Various
Science -- Periodicals
And that the vowels A and E were sometimes
prefixed to the Persian proper names, in the remoter periods of time,
is abundantly manifest, from the words SFITAMAN, ESFINTAMAN, or
ESPINTAMAN, the [87]name of either the father or one of the ancestors
of Zerâtusht; XERXES, [88]AXERXES, or AXERSES, and others of the same
kind, that might, with equal facility, be produced. Whether therefore
we read this legend----PADESHANE MONESH, PADESHAN EMONESH, or PADESHAN
AMONESH, we cannot greatly err. As the coin was not so perfectly
struck, part of the Greek legend is thereby apparently lost; from
whence, and the evident want of a word there, we may conclude, that
the Parthian legend, for Parthian by the explication here laid down
it appears to be, on the correspondent part of the reverse, must have
met with the same fate. What that Parthian term was, I cannot take
upon me to say; but the whole legend was probably something like THE
GREAT KING MONNESES, MONNESES THE KING OF KINGS, or MONNESES[89] THE
GREAT KING OF KINGS; all which titles are intirely consonant to those
assumed by the Parthian kings[90], and transmitted down to us on their
other coins. The Persian, or Parthian, termination of the proper name
MONNESES, and others that occur, was ESH. This may be inferred from
the legend now before me, in conjunction with Scripture[91], and has
been remarked by some good authors[92]. That the Greeks also expressed
the _Schin_ by their _Sigma_, and superadded another termination to
such words, is sufficiently manifest from the Persian, or Parthian
ARSHAK[93], which was converted into ARSACES by the Greek writers. I
must farther observe, that, according to Herodotus[94], the antient
letters of the Persians were those used by the Assyrians; which I take
to have been the same with the elements that prevailed amongst the
Syrians, and formed the alphabet of the Palmyrenes. Nay, we may collect
from [95]Epiphanius, that a considerable part of the Persians used the
Palmyrene characters as late as the decline of the fourth century after
CHRIST. All which being maturely weighed, I cannot forbear thinking
the interpretation of the Parthian legend here laid down in a good
degree probable. I am far however from insisting upon the truth of it.
I shall only beg to be indulged the liberty of proposing it to the
consideration of our most illustrious Society, and leave the fate of it
intirely to the decision of so very eminent a part of the learned world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account