Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part I. For the year 1757.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world.Various
History
Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part I. For the year 1757.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world.
Various
Science -- Periodicals
THE paper of mine, which was read before the Royal Society on the
8th of May 1755, and afterward printed in the xlixth volume of the
Philosophical Transactions[208], was written at the request of Mr.
Watson; who informed me, that a letter from the Abbé Mazeas to the
reverend Dr. Hales had been communicated to the Royal Society, in
which it was mentioned, that the Abbé Sauvages had made a discovery of
the juice of the Carolina Toxicodendron staining linen of a permanent
black. But Mr. Watson said, that the letter, he thought, required a
careful perusal before it was printed; and he wished I would confirm
it. I told him, if the letter was put into my hands, I would look it
over, and deliver my opinion of it.
Accordingly Dr. Birch delivered the letter to me; and, upon reading it,
I found, that tho’ this might be a discovery to those two gentlemen;
yet, as it had been mentioned in several printed books long before, I
thought it might not be for the reputation of the Royal Society to have
it printed as such in their Transactions.
This was my motive for writing that paper: in which I have not
endeavoured to depreciate the discovery of the Abbé Sauvages, but
have only mentioned what had occurred to me in those books of botany,
where that shrub is taken notice of. And as the knowlege of it, and
the method of collecting the varnish, might be of service to the
inhabitants of the British colonies in America, I took the liberty of
adding the account given of it by Dr. Kœmpfer.
Mr. Ellis, in his letter to Mr. Webb, asserts, that the American
_Toxicodendron_ is not the same with Kœmpfer’s _Arbor vernicifera
legitima_. This assertion of his makes it necessary to lay before
the Society the authorities, upon which I have grounded my belief,
that they are the same. But it may not be amiss first to take notice,
that the shrub mentioned by the Abbé Sauvages is the same with that,
which the gardeners about London call the Poison-ash. The title of it,
mentioned by the Abbé Sauvages, was given by myself to that shrub, in
a catalogue of trees and shrubs, which was printed in the year 1730;
before which it had no generical title applied to it. And about the
same time I sent several of the plants to Paris and Holland with that
title, which I had raised a few years before from seeds, which were
sent by Mr. Catesby from Carolina.
And altho’ this shrub had not been reduced to any genus before, yet it
had been some years growing in the gardens of the Bishop of London at
Fulham, at Mr. Reynardson’s at Hillenden, Mr. Darby’s at Hoxton, and in
the Chelsea garden, which were raised from seeds sent by Mr. Banister
from Virginia; two of which were growing at Chelsea in the year 1722,
when the care of that Garden was intrusted to me.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account