Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part I. For the year 1757.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world.Various
History
Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part I. For the year 1757.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world.
Various
Science -- Periodicals
If it proves so, this will by no means agree with the characters of
Rhus; especially if the male flowers should grow upon different plants
from the fruit, which is what I suspect. Nor can I agree with Dr.
Linnæus in this particular of joining all the species of Toxicodendron
to the genus of Rhus, many of which have their male flowers growing
upon different plants from the fruit; and therefore would more
properly come into his twenty-second class of _Dioecia_, than his fifth
of _Pentandria_, into which he ranges the Rhus. At the bottom of the
characters of that genus he has added a note, to shew the varnish-tree
is so.
But as there are several other species which agree in this essential
character of distinction; so, according to the Linnæan system, they
should be separated from the Rhus, with another generical title.
Mr. Ellis observes, upon the poetical description, which he lays
Kœmpfer has given of the leaves of the wild varnish-tree turning red in
the autumn, that he had not found it to be the case of the tree growing
in the stove at Busbridge. How it appeared in that situation, I know
not; but the leaves of all those, which are growing in the Chelsea
garden, and stand in the open air, do constantly change to a purple
colour in the autumn, before they fall off from the shrub: but those
of the true varnish-tree are much more remarkable for the deepness of
their colour.
Mr. Ellis says, he had received a letter from Dr. Sibthorp, professor
of botany at Oxford, in which the Doctor informs him, that there is
no specimen of the true varnish-tree in the Sherardian collection at
Oxford; but that there is one of _fasi-no-ki_, or spurious varnish-tree
of Kœmpfer. How the Doctor could write so, I cannot conceive; for I am
very sure there was no specimen of the latter in that collection while
it remained in London, having myself often viewed that part of it:
and sure I am, Dr. Dillenius never added that synonym to the former:
and I do believe the latter was no other way known in Europe, than by
Kœmpfer’s figure and description of it, excepting that specimen of
Kœmpfer’s now in the British Museum.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account