Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part II. For the year 1758.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world.Various
History
Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part II. For the year 1758.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world.
Various
Science -- Periodicals
3. None of the medals of the Syrian kings, with Phœnician letters
upon them[204], hitherto published, bear any Phœnician dates. This,
after what has been said, renders it extremely probable, that the
pieces of Sidon I am considering were posterior to those coins; and
even that their Phœnician dates referred to an æra different from that
of Seleucus, followed by the Greek dates on the medals of the Syrian
kings. Which if we admit, this æra could have been no other than the
new one of the Sidonians, that commenced in the seventh century of Rome.
4. That the dates visible on these coins were supputed according to
the latter epoch of Sidon, will be manifest from an examination of
the Greek and Phœnician brass medals of that city explained, in[205]
the beginning of this paper; whose type and workmanship are extremely
similar, if not almost intirely the same. For this circumstance is
to me an evident proof, that they could not have been struck at very
distant times. Now if we take the Greek coin to have followed the æra
of Seleucus, as was undoubtedly the case, and the others that peculiar
to Sidon; the first of the Phœnician dates[206] will not be prior to
the Greek one above fifty-three years, nor the last of them precede it
above forty-three years. Whereas if we suppose the numeral inscriptions
in the exergues of the Phœnician Sidonian coins to have been supputed
according to the Seleucian epoch, the difference between the aforesaid
dates will be five times as much; which with the similarity of
workmanship and type, already observed, will be altogether incompatible.
5. As the Jews[207], about the time that the first of our medals was
struck, denominated the æra of Seleucus, THE ÆRA OF THE KINGDOM OF
THE GREEKS; we cannot well doubt but it went amongst the Sidonians,
who were neighbours to the Jews, under the same denomination. From
whence it will follow, that the epoch styled by them emphatically, THE
ÆRA OF SIDON, must have been different from the æra of Seleucus; and
consequently that which, after the 643d year of Rome, was peculiar to
them.
[Illustration: _Philos. Trans. Vol. L._ TAB. XXXII. _p. 804_
PHŒNICIAN Numerals antiently used at SIDON, from _One_ to a _Thousand_.
_J. Mynde sc._]
The powers of the Phœnician numeral characters antiently used at Sidon,
which I flatter myself are now discovered, having been for many ages
unknown; the Society will perhaps not be displeased to see accurate
draughts of the principal Phœnician medals, from whence they are
deduced. I have therefore taken the liberty to transmit them[208] such
draughts, which may be intirely depended upon. I have also constructed
a table[209] of the numeral characters themselves, from UNITY TO A
THOUSAND; which will demonstrate, in the clearest manner possible, the
great affinity between them and those of the Palmyrenes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account