Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part II. For the year 1758.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world.Various
History
Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part II. For the year 1758.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world.
Various
Science -- Periodicals
This superiority I then guessed (as well as the difference of leaves
mentioned by Mr. Strachan) to arise from the cutting the tree down
every three or four years; which occasioned it to produce strong and
vigorous shoots, thicker and larger leaves, as well as greater quantity
of bark, and of a superior quality.
A large shoot or sucker of this plant was produced in the year 1750. or
51. by my worthy friend Dr. William Watson, together with an account
of the Cinnamon-tree; which is published in the _Philosoph. Transact._
vol. xlvii. p. 301. This shoot was a plain proof to me, that the
Cinnamon was frequently cut down, and that this shoot arose from the
root of a plant so cut; for it was of the size of a walking-cane; and
no shrub could have produced such a shoot, unless a strong plant cut
down.
This method of treating this plant accounts for the mistake of Garcias,
mentioned by Mr. Ray; _viz. Quæ Garcias habet de duplice hujus arboris
cortice ad modum suberis, nobis suspecta sunt, quæque de deliberatione
semel triennio facta; non enim puto renascitur cortex semel detractus._
This shews, that the bark was gathered every three years: but Mr. Ray
was not acquainted, that the plant was cut down, in order to take off
the bark, once in three years.
In the account above mentioned to be given to the Society by Dr.
Watson, no descriptions are given either of the plants of Ceylon, or
Malabar; but he quotes Burman, who says, that he had nine different
sorts of Cinnamon from Ceylon, of which that, which is the best, is
brought to us, and called by the name _Rasse Coronde_.
What the differences between these sorts were, does not appear; whether
in leaf or bark, or manner of culture. And I must observe, that in
all the specimens in the British Museum I could observe no difference
of species. But this is to be understood, that every sort coming from
Ceylon is, by the Dutch and by the shops, called Cinnamon; and that of
our own growth is by them always called Cassia. The reason is obvious.
The specimens, which I now produce, of the Canella or bark of the
Cinnamon of Sumatra, I procured in the year 1755. from Mr. Tho. Combes,
a gentleman then in the service of the East India Company in Sumatra,
by means of a friend.
I was then attempting to form a society for the carrying on a General
Natural History, to try proper experiments, and to employ proper
painters and engravers suitable to the importance of the subject; and
therefore attempted to establish a correspondence in those parts, whose
productions are as yet little known to the public.
I mention this design, because it would not be possible else to explain
what Mr. Combes means by the word _Society_, which he so often mentions
in his letter; of which I shall produce an extract, so far as it
relates to the present inquiry.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account