Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part II. For the year 1758.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world.Various
History
Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part II. For the year 1758.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world.
Various
Science -- Periodicals
However, we may with greater probability propose another use, for
which the ancients might employ such plates of glass, as are now under
consideration, _viz._ the adorning the walls of their apartments by
way of wainscot. This I take to be the meaning of the _vitreæ cameræ_
mentioned by Pliny[44]; who intimates, that this fashion took its rise
from glass being used by M. Scaurus[45] for embellishing the scene
of that magnificent theatre, which he erected for exhibiting shows
to the Roman people in his ædileship[46]. And we may collect from
the same author[47] (what is further confirmed by his contemporary
[48]Seneca), that this kind of ornament had been admitted, in his
time, into chambers in houses, baths, _&c._ Whether the plates used for
this purpose were stained with various colours (as mentioned above),
or had tints of divers kinds applied to the back part of them, I shall
not pretend to determine: but in either way they would have a very
agreeable effect.
The last destination, which the obvious congruity of the thing itself,
countenanced by the practice of many ages past, as well as of the
present time, would induce one to ascribe to such plates of glass, is
that of windows for houses, baths, portico’s, _&c._ But I am sensible,
that whoever should be hardy enough to advance such an hypothesis,
would be censured as an innovator, in opposing the general opinion of
the connoisseurs in antiquity. These gentlemen are almost unanimous in
asserting, that whenever we meet with mention made of _specularia_ in
ancient writers (especially those _of_, or near _to_, the age, to which
we must refer this fragment), we are to understand by that term nothing
but fences made of _laminæ_, either of a certain stone called from its
transparent quality _lapis specularis_[49], brought first from Hispania
Citerior, and afterwards found in Cyprus, Cappadocia, Sicily, and
Africa; or of another stone of the same nature, _viz._ the phengites.
These, tho’ expressly distinguished from each other by Pliny[50],
are yet reckoned by some moderns[51] as one and the same thing; and
thought to have been nothing but a kind of white transparent talc, of
which (according to Mons.[52] Valois) there is found a great quantity
in Moscovy at this day.
Now that this _lapis specularis_, or phengites, was really used for
windows by the ancient Romans in their houses, _&c._ cannot be denied;
since (according to the opinion of the learned[53] in antiquity) this
usage is mentioned by Seneca[54] among other improvements in luxury
introduced in his time. But whether it was so used exclusive of other
materials (particularly glass), may, I think, admit a doubt. Salmasius
is of opinion[55], that nothing can be determined upon this point from
the word _specular_ itself, which seems to be a generical term, equally
applicable to windows of all kinds, whether consisting of the _lapis
specularis_, or any other transparent substance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account