Philosophumena; or, The refutation of all heresies, Volume IHippolytus, Antipope
Philosophy
Philosophumena; or, The refutation of all heresies, Volume I
Hippolytus, Antipope
Christian heresies -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Occultism; Philosophy, Ancient
[Footnote 215: These words appear in the MS. at the foot of this Book.]
BOOK V
THE OPHITE HERESIES
[Sidenote: p. 137.] 1. These are the contents of the 5th (book) of the
Refutation of all Heresies.
2. What the Naassenes say who call themselves Gnostics, and that they
profess those opinions which the philosophers of the Greeks and the
transmitters of the Mysteries first laid down, starting wherefrom they
have constructed heresies.
3. And what things the Peratæ imagine, and that their doctrine is not
framed from the Holy Scriptures but from the astrological (art).
4. What is the system according to the Sithians, and that they have
patched together their doctrine by plagiarizing from those wise men
according to the Greeks, (to wit) Musæus and Linus and Orpheus.
5. What Justinus imagined and that his doctrine is not framed from
the Holy Scriptures, but from the marvellous tales of Herodotus the
historiographer.
1. _Naassenes._[1]
[Sidenote: p. 138.] 6. I consider that the tenets concerning the Divine
and the fashioning of the cosmos (held by) all those who are deemed
philosophers by Greeks and Barbarians have been very painfully set
forth in the four books before this. Whose curious arts I have not
neglected, so that I have undertaken for the readers no chance labour,
exhorting many to love of learning and certainty of knowledge about the
truth. Now therefore there remains to hasten on to the refutation of
the heresies, with which intent[2] also we have set forth the things
aforesaid. From which philosophers the heresiarchs have taken hints in
common[3] and patching like cobblers the mistakes of the ancients on to
their own thoughts, have offered them as new to those they can deceive,
as we shall prove in (the books) which follow. For the rest, it is time
to approach the subjects laid down before, but to begin with those who
have dared to sing the praises of the Serpent, who is in fact the cause
of the error, through certain systems invented by his action. Therefore
[Sidenote: p. 139.] the priests and chiefs of the doctrine were the
first who were called Naassenes, being thus named in the Hebrew tongue:
for the Serpent is called Naas.[4] Afterwards they called themselves
Gnostics alleging that they alone knew the depths.[5] Separating
themselves from which persons, many men have made the heresy, which is
really one, a much divided affair, describing the same things according
to varying opinions, as this discourse will argue as it proceeds.
These men worship as the beginning of all things, according to
their own statement, a Man and a Son of Man. But this Man is
masculo-feminine[6] and is called by them Adamas;[7] and hymns to him
are many and various. And [Sidenote: p. 140.] the hymns, to cut it
short, are repeated by them somehow like this:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account