Philosophumena; or, The refutation of all heresies, Volume IHippolytus, Antipope
Philosophy
Philosophumena; or, The refutation of all heresies, Volume I
Hippolytus, Antipope
Christian heresies -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Occultism; Philosophy, Ancient
[Sidenote: p. 204.] “The setting and rising mingle with one
another.”--
(Aratus, _Phain._, v. 62.)
This it is concerning which ignorance speaks:--
“The Dragon winds, great wonder of dread portent.”--
(_Ibid._, v. 46.)
and on either side of him Corona and Lyra are ranged and above, by the
very top of his head, a piteous man, the Kneeler, is seen
“Holding the sole of the right foot of winding Draco.”--
(_Ibid._, v. 70.)
And in the rear of the Kneeler is the imperfect serpent grasped with
both hands by Ophiuchus and prevented from touching the Crown lying by
the Perfect Serpent.[232]
17. This is the variegated wisdom of the Peratic heresy, which is
difficult to describe completely, it being so tangled through having
been framed from the art of astrology. So far as it was possible,
therefore, we have set forth all its force in few words. But in order
to expound their whole mind in epitome we think it right to add
this: According to them the universe is Father, Son and Matter.[233]
[Sidenote: p. 205.] Of these three every one contains within himself
boundless powers. Now midway between Matter and the Father sits the
Son, the Word, the Serpent, ever moving himself towards the immoveable
Father and towards Matter (which itself) is moved. And sometimes he
turns himself towards the Father and receives the powers in his own
person,[234] and when he has thus received them he turns towards
Matter; and Matter being without quality and formless takes pattern
from the forms[235] which the Son has taken as patterns from the
Father. But the Son takes pattern from the Father unspeakably and
silently and unchangeably, that is, as Moses says the colours of
the (sheep) that longed,[236] flowed from the rods set up in the
drinking-places. In such a way also did the powers flow from the Son
to Matter according to the yearning of the power which (flowed) from
the rods upon the things conceived. But the difference and unlikeness
of the colours which flowed from the rods through the waters into the
sheep is, he says, the difference of corruptible and incorruptible
birth. Or rather, as a painter while taking nothing from the animals
(he paints), yet transfers with his pencil to the drawing-tablet all
their forms, thus the Son by his own power transfers to Matter the
[Sidenote: p. 206.] types[237] of the Father. All things that are here
are therefore the Father’s types and nothing else. For if any one, he
says has strength enough to comprehend from the things here that he
is a type from the Father on high transferred hither and made into a
body, as in the conception from the rod, he becomes white,[238] (and)
wholly of one substance[239] with the Father who is in the heavens,
and returns thither. But if he does not light upon this doctrine, nor
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account