Philosophumena; or, The refutation of all heresies, Volume IHippolytus, Antipope
Philosophy
Philosophumena; or, The refutation of all heresies, Volume I
Hippolytus, Antipope
Christian heresies -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Occultism; Philosophy, Ancient
the book inscribed Baruch in which he who reads will know the whole
management of their myth.
Now, though I have met with many heresies, beloved, I have met with
none worse than this. But truly, as the saying is, we ought, imitating
his Heracles, to cleanse the Augean dunghill or rather trench, having
fallen into which his followers will never be washed clean nor indeed
be able to come up out of it.
28. Since then we have set forth the designs of Justinus the Gnostic
falsely so called, it seems fitting to set forth also [Sidenote: p.
241.] in the succeeding books the tenets of the heresies which follow
him[332] and to leave none of them unrefuted; the things said by them
being quite sufficient when exposed to make an example of them, if and
only their hidden and unspeakable (mysteries) would leap to light into
which the senseless are hardly and with much toil initiated.[333] Let
us see now what Simon says.
END OF VOL. I.
FOOTNOTES
[Footnote 1: In this chapter, Hippolytus treats of what is probably a
late form of the Ophite heresy, certainly one of the first to enter
into rivalry with the Catholic Church. For its doctrines and practices,
the reader must be referred to the chapter on the Ophites in the
translator’s _Forerunners and Rivals of Christianity_, vol. II; but
it may be said here that it seems to have sprung from a combination
of the corrupt Judaism then practised in Asia Minor with the Pagan
myths or legends prevalent all over Western Asia, which may some day
be traced back to the Sumerians and the earliest civilization of which
we have any record. Yet the Ophites admitted the truth of the Gospel
narrative, and asserted the existence of a Supreme Being endowed with
the attributes of both sexes and manifesting Himself to man by means
of a Deity called His son, who was nevertheless identified with both
the masculine and feminine aspects of his Father. This triad, which the
Ophites called the First Man, the Second Man, and the First Woman or
Holy Spirit, they represented as creating the planetary worlds as well
as the “world of form,” by the intermediary of an inferior power called
Sophia or Wisdom and her son Jaldabaoth, who is expressly stated to be
the God of the Jews.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account