Philosophy in Sport Made Science in Earnest: Being an Attempt to Illustrate the First Principles of Natural Philosophy by the Aid of Popular Toys and SportsParis, John Ayrton
Science
Philosophy in Sport Made Science in Earnest: Being an Attempt to Illustrate the First Principles of Natural Philosophy by the Aid of Popular Toys and Sports
Paris, John Ayrton
Science -- Juvenile literature
Three coloured wafers were then placed, at equal distances from each
other, on the disc, and the instrument having been arranged before a
looking-glass, the party were desired to observe the reflected image as
the circle revolved.
“The wafers are blended into one continuous zone,” observed Mrs.
Seymour.
“To be sure,” said Louisa; “upon the same principle that the ignited
stick appears as a fiery circle.”
“It would be very strange, after the different experiments we have
seen, if we were not able to explain the present appearance,” observed
Tom.
“The fiery circle produced by the revolving stick is a much better
illustration of the principle; I do not see what object Mr. Seymour has
in thus multiplying his experiments,” said the vicar.
“Gently, if you please, Mr. Twaddleton, and, before you favour us with
your criticism, wait until I have concluded my experiment. You have
seen that the reflected image of the revolving wafers appears as a
continuous zone, and you have very correctly explained the reason of
such an appearance; but I must now request you to inspect the reflected
image through the slit in the disc, as it revolves, and say what new
effect you observe.”
“How very strange!” exclaimed Tom; “I see the three wafers very
distinctly, and perfectly at rest.”
“Impossible,” exclaimed the vicar--“let me have a peep. Why, I declare,
they appear, as you say, stationary, although I know them to be in
rapid motion; as sure as fate I shall become a Cartesian.”
The Major, Louisa, and Mrs. Seymour, were all equally surprised, and
incapable of giving any explanation of the phenomenon they had
witnessed.
“Let us remember,” said Mr. Seymour, “that in viewing the image through
the slit in the revolving disc, we catch but a momentary glance as it
passes before the eye, and that the image thus produced on the retina
is retained until the next revolution again brings the slit into the
same position. Now it is evident, that before the eye can ascertain a
body to be in motion, it must observe it in two successive portions of
time, in order to compare its change of place;[68] but in the
experiment under consideration, the glance is momentary, the wafer is
no sooner seen than it passes away; its figure alone is impressed upon
the retina, and this impression is continued without any change, until
the circle completes its round, and consequently the image must appear
at rest.”
“I understand you; the figure, but not the motion, of the wafer, is
discernible in the short period during which it is visible through the
slit,” observed the vicar.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account