This interview had taken place a week before the dinner party for which
Phyllis was carefully dressed by her maid Fidele while Herbert Courtland
was walking away from the house. In spite of her logic, Lady Earlscourt
now and again stumbled across the truth. When it occurred to her that
Phyllis had another man in her eye,--the phrase was Lady Earlscourt’s
and it served very well to express her meaning,--she had made some
careful inquiries on the subject of the girl’s male visitors, and she
had, of course, found out that no other man occupied that enviable
position; no social oculist would be required to remove the element
which, in Lady Earlscourt’s estimation, caused Phyllis’ vision to be
distorted.
George Holland was at the dinner. Phyllis had been asked very quietly by
the hostess if she would mind being taken in by George Holland; if she
had the least feeling on the matter, Sir Lionel Greatorex would not mind
taking her instead of Mrs. Vernon-Brooke. But Phyllis had said that of
course she would be delighted to sit beside Mr. Holland. Mr. Holland was
one of her best friends.
“Is his case so hopeless as that?” said Lady Earlscourt, in a low voice,
and Phyllis smiled in response--the smile of the guest when the hostess
had made a point.
When Lady Earlscourt had indiscreetly, but confidentially, explained to
some of her guests the previous week that she meant her little dinner
party to be the means of reuniting Mr. Holland and Miss Ayrton, one of
them--he was a man--smiled and said, when she had gone away, that she
was a singularly unobservant woman, or she would have known that the
best way of bringing two people together is to keep them as much apart
as possible. There was wisdom in the paradox, he declared; for everyone
should know that it was only when a man and a woman were far apart that
they came to appreciate each other.
It seemed, indeed, that there was some truth in what that man said, for
Phyllis, before the ice pudding appeared, had come to the conclusion
that George Holland was a very uninteresting sort of man. To be sure, he
had not talked about himself,--he was not such a fool as to do that: he
had talked about her to the exclusion of almost every other topic--he
had been wise enough to do that,--but in spite of all, he had not
succeeded in arousing her interest. He had not succeeded in making
her think of the present when her thoughts had been dwelling on the
past--not the distant past, not the past of two months ago, when they
had been lovers, but the past of two hours ago, when she had watched the
effect of her words upon Herbert Courtland.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account