As the land rose at different periods above the ocean, each part, as it
emerged from the waves, had probably been clothed with vegetation, and
peopled with animals, suited to its position with regard to the equator,
and to the climate and condition of the globe then being. And as the
conditions and climate were different at each succeeding geological
epoch, so each portion of the land, as it rose, would be characterized
by its own vegetation and animals, and thus at last there would be many
centres of creation, as at this day, all differing more or less from one
another, and hence, alpine floras must be of older date than those in
the plains. The vegetation and faunas of those lands that differed most
in age and place would be most dissimilar, while the plants and animals
of such as were not far removed from one another in time and place would
have correlative forms or family likenesses, yet each would form a
distinct province. Thus, in opposite hemispheres, and everywhere at
great distances, but under like circumstances, the species are
representatives of one another, rarely identical: when, however, the
conditions which suit certain species are continuous, identical species
are found throughout, either by original creation or by migration. The
older forms may have been modified to a certain extent by the succeeding
conditions of the globe, but they never could have been changed, since
immutability of species is a primordial law of nature. Neither external
circumstances, time, nor human art, can change one species into another,
though each to a certain extent is capable of accommodating itself to a
change of external circumstances, so as to produce varieties even
transmissible to their offspring.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account