Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of SenecaSeneca, Lucius Annaeus
Philosophy
Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of Seneca
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
Comets; Earthquakes; Meteorology -- Early works to 1800
Nor yet did these ancient sages believe that the Jupiter we worship 1
in the Capitol and the rest of the temples ever really hurled
thunderbolts from his hand. They recognised the same Jupiter as we do,
the guardian and ruler of the universe, its soul and breath, the maker
and lord of this earthly frame of things, to whom every name of power
is appropriate. If you prefer to call him fate, you will not be wrong.
He it is on whom depend all things, from whom proceed all causes of
causes. If you prefer to call him providence, you will still be right;
for he it is by whose counsel provision is made for the world that 2
it may pursue its orderly course and unfold the drama of its being.
If you prefer to call him nature, you will make no mistake; for it is
he from whom all things derive being, and by whose breath we live. If
you prefer to call him the world, you will not be in error; for he is
everything that you can see, he is wholly infused in all his parts,
self-sustained through inherent power. The Etruscans thought so too.
They said bolts were sent by Jove, just because nothing is performed
except by his power.
XLVI
But, you ask, why does Jupiter pass over the guilty and strike the
innocent? That is too big a question to enter on here; it shall have
its own place and time. Meantime I insist on this, that bolts are not
sent directly by Jupiter, but that all things are so arranged that even
what is not done by him is yet not done without some plan, which plan
is his. The force of the bolts is a consequence of his permission. For
even though Jupiter does not make them, he caused them to be made. He
does not superintend every detail; but to all he gives the signal,
force, and cause.
XLVII
There is another division of them made to which I cannot agree. They
are, according to the assertion of some, either constant or limited
or deferred. The constant are those whose prognostication extends all
over life, not merely intimating a single occurrence, but embracing the
series of coming events through the whole subsequent life. This is the
kind of bolt that occurs first after entrance on an inheritance, or
when an individual or a city has entered on a new phase of existence.
Limited ones answer exactly to a definite date. Deferred are those
whose threats may be delayed, though they cannot be averted and
completely avoided.
XLVIII
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account