Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of SenecaSeneca, Lucius Annaeus
Philosophy
Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of Seneca
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
Comets; Earthquakes; Meteorology -- Early works to 1800
No man is so utterly dull and obtuse, with head so bent on earth, 1
as never to lift himself up and rise with all his soul to the
contemplation of the starry heavens, especially when some fresh
wonder shows a beacon-light in the sky. As long as the ordinary
course of heaven runs on, custom robs it of its real size. Such is
our constitution that objects of daily occurrence pass us unnoticed
even when most worthy of our admiration. On the other hand, the sight
even of trifling things is attractive if their appearance is unusual.
So this concourse of stars, which paints with beauty the spacious 2
firmament on high, gathers no concourse of the nation. But when there
is any change in the wonted order, then all eyes are turned to the
sky. The sun has no observer unless he is in eclipse. No one watches
the moon unless she suffer obscuration. But then whole cities cry out,
groundless superstition drives every one into panic. And yet how much
greater are the ordinary movements of the sun! He takes, so to speak, 3
as many steps as there are days, completing the year in his circuit.
From the summer solstice he turns back to the lessening days, from the
solstice he slopes his rays,[90] and gives more room to the nights; he
occults the planets; though so much larger than the earth he does not
burn it up, but cheers it by his heat, which he so regulates as to make
it alternately more intense and more subdued. He never fills up with
light, nor yet obscures, the moon, except when she is right opposite 4
to him. All this we allow to pass unnoticed as long as the usual order
is preserved. But if there is any disturbance or any extraordinary
light displayed in the sky, we gaze at it, ask questions, and point
it out to our neighbours. So natural is it to admire what is strange
rather than what is great.
[90] There is some corruption in the text, but no probable
restoration has been suggested. From the Latin words it would appear
that this clause is merely an explanation of the previous one,
inserted by some officious copyist and therefore spurious.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account