Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of SenecaSeneca, Lucius Annaeus
Philosophy
Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of Seneca
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
Comets; Earthquakes; Meteorology -- Early works to 1800
For, on account of their infrequency, their orbit cannot as yet be
discovered or examined in detail, to see whether they observe periodic
laws, and whether some fixed order causes their reappearance at the
appointed day. Such a development of astronomy is recent, having been
lately introduced into Greece.
III
Democritus, the most acute of all the ancient philosophers, says he 1
suspects there are several stars whose orbits are erratic. But he has
given neither their number nor their names, as the motions of the five
planets were not in his time understood. Eudoxus was, in fact, the
first to import from Egypt into Greece the knowledge of these motions,
though he says nothing about comets. From this it becomes plain
that, even among the Egyptians, the people that bestowed most care
on observation of the sky, the portion of astronomy that relates to
comets had not been worked out. Subsequently Conon, who was himself a 2
careful investigator, made a record of the sun’s eclipses that had been
observed by the Egyptians; but he made no mention of comets, though he
would certainly not have omitted anything definite on the subject that
he had learned in Egypt. So much is certain; two authors, Epigenes and
Apollonius of Myndus, the latter highly skilled in casting horoscopes,
who say that they studied among the Chaldaeans, are at variance in
their accounts. The latter asserts that comets are placed by the 3
Chaldaeans among the number of the wandering stars (_i.e._ planets),
and that their orbits have been determined. Epigenes, on the contrary,
asserts that the Chaldaeans have ascertained nothing regarding comets,
which are thought by them to be fires produced by a kind of eddy of
violently rotating air.
IV
In the first place, if it like you, let us set down the views of the 1
last-mentioned author and refute them. He supposes that the planet
Saturn has most influence in determining all motions of the heavenly
bodies. When it presses upon the constellations next Mars, or crosses
to the neighbourhood of the moon, or encounters the rays of the sun,
being naturally cold and windy, it contracts and masses the atmosphere
at more than one place. By and by, if Saturn absorb all the sun’s rays,
there is thunder and lightning. If he has Mars in agreement, the 2
lightning is forked. Moreover, he continues, forked and sheet lightning
contain different materials. Evaporation from water or other moisture
produces only gleams that threaten but stop short of striking. The
hotter and drier exhalation of the earth forges the bolts of forked
lightning. Beam meteors and torches, which differ from one another 3
only in size, are produced in this same way. When any ball of air--what
we call a whirlwind--encloses moist earthy matter, wherever it rushes
it presents the appearance of an extended line of fire, which lasts
just so long as the mass of air remains, which carries within it the
supply of moist earthy matter.
V
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account