Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of SenecaSeneca, Lucius Annaeus
Philosophy
Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of Seneca
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
Comets; Earthquakes; Meteorology -- Early works to 1800
Let Epigenes, therefore, make his choice of the two alternatives: 1
if the force is small, it cannot reach so high; if it is great and
violent, it will the more quickly break up. But further, according to
the opinion of people like Epigenes, these lower comets do not mount
higher because they have too much earthiness in them. Their weight
keeps them in the neighbourhood of earth. And yet these other comets,
which are higher and last longer, must have a more abundant material.
For they could not last so long were their supplies not replenished
from a larger stock. I said a moment ago that the whirlwind’s eddy 2
could not long endure, nor could it mount higher than the moon, or as
far as the place of stars. Of course, the whirlwind is caused by the
mutual struggle of several winds, and the contest cannot be kept up
for any long time. When the wandering uncertain air assumes a rotatory
form, in the last instance the force of all the winds yields to the
single strongest one. No hurricane lasts long. The more strength 3
squalls have, the shorter their duration. When winds reach their
maximum, they quickly abate all their violence. By that headlong speed
they must needs hasten to their own destruction. So no one has ever
seen a whirlwind last a whole day, or even an hour. Its velocity is
astonishing, its brevity no less astonishing. Moreover, on the earth
and near it, its rotation is swifter and more violent; the higher it 4
is, the less condensed and compact is it, and that is the reason of
its more rapid dissipation. Add the fact, too, that even if it reached
the highest region where the stars’ path lies, it would most certainly
be broken up by the motion which causes the universe to revolve. For
what can compare in rapidity with the revolution of the world? Thereby
the strength of all the winds combined in one would be shattered, aye,
and the strong solid chain that binds the earth, not to say a wisp of
whirling air.
X
Again, a fire carried along by a whirlwind cannot remain on high 1
unless the whirlwind also remain. But then what is so inconceivable as
any prolonged duration in a whirlwind? Above all, the whirlwind motion
is neutralised by the opposite motion of the heavens. That region on
high to which it is alleged to mount has an eddying motion of its own,
which carries onward the sky,
And drags the lofty stars, and turns them in rapid whirl.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account