Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of SenecaSeneca, Lucius Annaeus
Philosophy
Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of Seneca
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
Comets; Earthquakes; Meteorology -- Early works to 1800
After the death of Demetrius, king of Syria, whose kingdom was 1
divided by his sons Demetrius and Antiochus, a little before the
Achaean War, a comet blazed forth not inferior to the sun in size.
Its orb was at first fiery red, and emitted a bright light sufficient
to dispel the darkness of night. By and by its size was gradually
reduced and its brightness waned. Finally it went completely out. How
many stars, suppose you, would require to combine to make up such a
huge mass? You might collect in one a thousand of them without ever 2
matching the size of the sun. In the reign of Attalus a comet appeared,
moderately small in size to begin with. By and by it mounted up and
spread out and moved as far as the equator, equalling in the extent of
its immense length the whole quarter of the sky which we call the Milky
Way. How many planets must have combined to occupy with an unbroken
line of fire such a long tract of the sky?
XVI
I have refuted the argument; I must now discredit its authors. It 1
requires no great effort to strip Ephorus of his authority; he is a
mere chronicler. Some of his class seek to recommend their narrative by
incredible stories, and by their marvels try to interest the reader,
who would probably soon find some other occupation if he were called
on to wade through their tedious narrative of ordinary events. Some,
again, are too credulous, some too careless, some are deluded, some
delighted, by falsehood. The former do not shun it, the latter go in
quest of it. The whole clan of them have this in common; they fancy 2
their work cannot merit approval, and become popular unless they freely
interlard it with lies. Ephorus is not a person of any scrupulous
honour; he is often duped, often he tries to dupe. For example, he
asserts that the great comet which, by its rising, sank Helice and
Buris, which was carefully watched by the eyes of the whole world since
it drew issues of great moment in its train, split up into two stars;
but nobody besides him has recorded it. Who, I wonder, could observe
the moment at which the comet broke up and was resolved into two 3
parts? And if there is any one who saw it split up into two, how is it
that no one saw it first formed out of the two? And why did Ephorus not
add the names of the two stars into which it was broken up, since they
must have been some of the five planets?
XVII
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account