Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of SenecaSeneca, Lucius Annaeus
Philosophy
Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of Seneca
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
Comets; Earthquakes; Meteorology -- Early works to 1800
Had Seneca designed to prepare a formal or methodical treatise, he
would doubtless have planned it to include the three sections which he
regarded as comprising every inquiry that can arise as to the nature
and constitution of the Universe (_Universum_)--celestial, atmospheric,
and terrestrial (_Caelestia, Sublimia, Terrena_, 51). The world
(_Mundus_) in his view comprehends all things that come or can come
within our cognisance (54). Instead of entering upon a full discussion
of any one of his three sections, he selected from them a few topics
which had probably more particularly engaged his attention. Most of
these belong to the second or atmospheric division of his scheme of
arrangement, to which he devotes six of his seven books, the remaining
one being given to the discussion of some celestial phenomena. Certain
subjects which we should naturally range in the terrestrial series,
such as the source and flow of rivers and the nature and origin of
earthquakes, he explicitly includes among his atmospheric phenomena
(51).
It appears to be probable that Seneca had neither finished nor revised
his manuscript at the time of his death. Parts of the work are
obviously incomplete, though some of these gaps may be due to defects
of transcription or to the subsequent loss of parts of the text. The
obscurities of language, which are not infrequent, may likewise have
partly arisen from lack of the author’s revision of his original copy.
His discussion of the problem of the rise of the Nile suddenly breaks
off in such an abrupt manner as to suggest the loss of a portion of the
original volume. One of the most important omissions is the absence of
any account of the phenomena of volcanoes. The author does indeed refer
in several places to this subject, but with Aetna before him, of which
so many Greek and Latin poets had sung, and which had so often been
referred to in the writings of the philosophers, he could hardly have
meant to offer no commentary on so notable a feature in the geography
and history of his own country. We know indeed that he was keenly
interested in this mountain, and that he wrote to Lucilius to ascend
the volcano and send him particulars about it. In the letter conveying
this request he alludes to some of the Roman poets who had sung of its
wonders, and urges that a description of Aetna should form part of a
poem on which his correspondent appears to have been then engaged.[103]
Another important subject in physical geography finds no place in
Seneca’s volume--the Sea. Of the outer ocean it was not to be expected
that he could have had much to say, but we can hardly suppose that he
would have considered his essay complete without some discussion of the
various phenomena presented by the Mediterranean Sea.
[103] Seneca, _Epist._ lxxix.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account