Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of SenecaSeneca, Lucius Annaeus
Philosophy
Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of Seneca
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
Comets; Earthquakes; Meteorology -- Early works to 1800
[107] _De Rer. Nat._ v. 564, 650, 680, 727.
Seneca, however, had, on the whole, a more advanced appreciation of
the relations of the earth to the heavenly bodies. He believed the sun
to be larger than our globe, and that a thousand stars might be put
together without equalling his mass (284, 288). He thought the heavens
to be so vast as to afford space for the swiftest of the planets to
rush along with uninterrupted speed during full thirty years (7). He
showed his enlightened outlook upon astronomical possibilities when he
surmised that comets may have orbits that carry them far beyond the
Zodiac, and when he conjectured that other planets than those then
known remained to be discovered (296–299). And yet, sharing these more
enlarged conceptions, he clung with curious pertinacity to some of the
old childish faith which was natural in the infancy of mankind. He
knew that some philosophers held that it is the earth which revolves
and not the heavens, and though he does not deliberately reject this
opinion, it is evident that he still held that the heavens circle
round the earth.[108] Again and again he expresses his conviction that
the force which sustains the energy of the sun and the stars consists
of the exhalations that arise from the surface of the earth. These
exhalations, he says, are the pasturage of the heavenly bodies, the
breath of the world. It would be impossible, he asserts, for the earth
to furnish so ample a store of nourishment to bodies larger than itself
unless it were full of breath which is passing off from every part of
its surface both by day and night. To the obvious objection that the
supply of this energy would soon become exhausted, he has the reply
that this exhaustion would certainly take place were it not that the
elements are in a condition of continual transformation, issuing in
one form, passing into each other, and returning to their original
positions, thence to begin their cycle anew (55, 198, 244–5). In this
universal transmutation water passes into air, air into water; air
likewise is changed into fire, fire into air, while earth is formed
from water, and water from earth (120).
[108] See _postea_, Notes on Book VII.
In his general conception of the universe, Seneca, as a Stoic
philosopher, recognised a principle of evolution. He believed that the
world embraces in its constitution everything that it is destined to
experience from its beginning to its end. As a human embryo contains
the germ of the future man, so at the first creation of the universe,
sun and moon, the changes of the stars, and the birth of living things
were all embraced. And there were likewise included the forces whereby
the earth is affected, and which will ultimately lead to the final
destruction of the globe (151).[109]
[109] Lucretius, too, had his views on evolution, which are well
expressed in four lines of verse:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account