Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of SenecaSeneca, Lucius Annaeus
Philosophy
Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of Seneca
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
Comets; Earthquakes; Meteorology -- Early works to 1800
Seneca, in passing on to discuss the nature and origin of thunder and
lightning, divides the phenomena into three kinds--lightning-flashes,
thunderbolts, and thunderings (62). After citing and commenting on the
opinions of various philosophers he proceeds to give his own views
regarding these appearances. The lightning flash (_fulguratio_) he
looks upon as fire widely spread out, the thunderbolt (_fulmen_) as
fire condensed and hurled with violence (66). The difference between
the two is in force rather than character; a flash is a bolt without
strength enough to reach the earth, while a thunderbolt is lightning
in its most intense form (69). With regard to the origin of the fire
he points out that fire may be artificially produced in two ways:
either by percussion, as when stones are struck; or by friction, as
when two bits of wood are rubbed against each other. He thinks that
probably in both of these ways clouds may emit fire, and that in the
violence of storms a source of energy is supplied whereby the warm or
smoky exhalations from the earth may be kindled and fall with a fierce
glow to the earth (70, 101). These exhalations contain dry and moist
bodies, to which heavier elements may be added. A combination of such
materials will form a thicker and more solid cloud than one of pure
air, and such a cloud may burst with a loud report (78). There can be
no peal of thunder unless the hollow clouds are broken up with great
violence (76). The characteristic path of the thunderbolt is determined
by the oblique current of air in which, while the natural tendency of
the fire is upward, the violence of its discharge presses it downwards
and compels it to take up a zig-zag course. The peculiar ozone odour
noticed during thunderstorms, and long popularly known as the smell of
sulphur, is alluded to by Seneca (69, 97) and by Lucretius.[111]
[111] Similar views on thunder and lightning are expressed in the _De
Rerum Natura_:
semina quod nubes ipsas permulta necessust
ignis habere.--vi. 206.
post ubi conminuit vis eius et impetus acer,
tum perterricrepo sonitu dat scissa fragorem.--_Ibid._ 128.
... notaeque gravis halantis sulpuris auras.--_Ibid._ 221.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account