Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of SenecaSeneca, Lucius Annaeus
Philosophy
Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of Seneca
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
Comets; Earthquakes; Meteorology -- Early works to 1800
But how, you may object, can you tell me that there are many thousands
of images there, where I can see none at all? Besides, as there is
but one colour in the sun, why are there different colours in the 10
reflections of him? These objections which you have put forward, as
well as others that no less call for refutation, I will endeavour to
refute. And let me say, first of all, that nothing is more deceptive
than our eyesight, not merely in objects whose careful examination is
prevented by distance in position,[26] but even in objects seen close
at hand. An oar, though quite whole, presents the appearance of being
broken when seen in clear shallow water. Apples seen through glass
appear much larger than they really are. In long colonnades, pillars 11
set at intervals present an apparently unbroken continuity of line. Or
go back to the case of the sun himself; his orb, which reason proves to
be larger than the whole earth, is so contracted by human sight that
some of the philosophers have maintained that it is only a foot in
diameter. He is, we know, the swiftest of all luminaries, yet none of
us can see him move; nor should we believe that he does advance, were
it not evident from time to time that he has advanced. The world itself
glides on with headlong speed; within an instant of time it unfolds its
risings and its settings, yet none of us is aware of its movement. What
cause, then, is there for wonder if our eyesight cannot separate 12
the drops of the rain showers, and loses the distinction of the images
on account of the vast distance at which they are beheld? At any rate
no one can doubt this, that the rainbow is a reflection of the sun,
formed in a hollow cloud full of moisture. This is made plain from the
simple fact that the image is never seen except opposite the sun, high
up or low down, in inverse relation, just as he sinks or elevates his
course. When he descends, it is higher; when he is high in the heavens,
it is more sunken. A cloud of the required kind is often at the side 13
of the sun without producing a rainbow, because it does not catch his
image straight in front.
[26] The received text gives “diversity of colours.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account