Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of SenecaSeneca, Lucius Annaeus
Philosophy
Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of Seneca
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
Comets; Earthquakes; Meteorology -- Early works to 1800
Lightning portends the future, too. Nor do the signs it gives refer 1
to only one or two events. Often a complete series of fate’s succeeding
decrees is intimated, with proof, too, plain to demonstration, far more
distinct than if it were recorded in writing. There are differences
of interpretation, however, between our countrymen and the Tuscans,
the latter of whom possess consummate skill in the explanation of the
meaning of lightning. We think that because clouds collide, therefore 2
lightning is emitted; they hold that clouds collide in order that
lightning may be emitted. They refer everything to the will of God:
therefore they are strong in their conviction that lightning does not
give an indication of the future because it has occurred, but occurs
because it is meant to give this indication. Whether the indication is
its purpose or its consequence makes no difference in the method of its
occurrence. How, then, do they give indication unless they are sent by
God? Just in the same way as birds give favourable or unfavourable 3
omens, though they are not moved on their flight for the express
purpose of meeting us. God moves them too, it is urged. You imagine He
has so little to do that He can attend to trifles of this sort, if you
will have Him arrange visions for one, entrails of victims for another.
Nevertheless, all those things are managed by Divine agency, not, 4
however, in the sense that the wings of birds are immediately directed
by God, or the bowels of cattle arranged by Him in certain forms under
the priest’s axe. It is in far other way that the roll of fate is
unfolded; it sends ahead in all directions intimations of what is to
follow, which are in part familiar, in part unknown to us. Everything
that happens is a sign of something that is going to happen: mere
chance occurrences uncontrolled by any rational principle do not
admit of the application of divination. An event that belongs to a 5
series thereby becomes capable of being predicted. But why, then, is
the honour conferred upon the eagle of giving omens concerning great
events? or a similar function assigned to the raven and a very few
other birds, while all the rest give no presage by their notes? The
reason simply is that some departments have not yet been brought within
the sphere of the art of augury, while some are incapable of ever being
brought within it, because our acquaintance with them is too slight.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account