Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the communityHooker, Worthington
Science
Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the community
Hooker, Worthington
Medical ethics; Physician and patient; Physicians; Quacks and quackery
The testimony of physicians in such cases would be very apt to be
disregarded, however rational and clear it might be, unless it could
be brought to confront the testimony of the bone-setter himself.
Whenever this is done, educated skill always comes off victorious
over quackery. Nothing so exposes and demolishes quackery, as a
well-directed examination of the quack himself. It dispels from
the minds of the jury the false notion of a natural gift that
needs no teaching; a notion, which, so long as it remains in the
mind, effectually prevents any candid examination of the facts.
They are made to see by such a course, that the joints of the body
are constructed upon mechanical principles, and that they are to
be understood just like any other machine; and the ignorance and
consequent want of skill of the bone-setter become even ridiculously
palpable. Some few years ago a physician in Springfield, Mass., was
prosecuted by a patient for mal-practice. The case had fallen from
his hands into those of a celebrated bone-setter, who appeared as a
witness at the trial. The physician was triumphantly acquitted, and
the exposed ignorance of the bone-setter had more influence with the
jury, than all the display of surgical knowledge on the part of the
faculty, drawn out by the learned counsel.
It now remains for me to show why it is that natural bone-setters,
in spite of all their ignorance and their mistakes, acquire such a
reputation for success, as they often do. I deem it a very easy task
to do this to the satisfaction of any reasonable person.
I have already alluded to those cases in which the bone is not
dislocated, but the patient supposes, and the bone-setter supposes,
or, as is more often the case, _pretends_, that there is a
dislocation. These are the cases which are the principal source of
the bone-setter’s reputation. He pulls upon the affected limb and
performs various manœuvres with it, and then thinks, or pretends,
that he has ‘set’ the bone. In time the limb of course in most
instances gets well, and thus in a case of mere sprain he gains the
credit of having performed a wonderful operation. Especially is this
so, when the patient has been first examined by a regular physician.
_Probably more than half of the reputed cases of dislocation which
come under the care of bone-setters are nothing but sprains._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account