Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the communityHooker, Worthington
Science
Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the community
Hooker, Worthington
Medical ethics; Physician and patient; Physicians; Quacks and quackery
Now it is clear, that if it were an easy thing to decide what is
successful practice and what is not, from an observation of results,
then there would not be such diversity, nor such frequent change
of opinion in the public mind, in regard to modes of treatment so
directly opposed to each other, as those are which I have mentioned.
The advocates of them would not so boldly urge their claims, knowing
the facility with which these claims could be tested. But the
difficulties which actually lie in the way of testing them are such,
that the community are exceedingly liable to be deceived. Practice,
which is really unsuccessful, is often made by its advocates to
appear for a time at least, to be more successful than any other mode
of treatment, and it is often only by long continued observation that
this error is corrected.
This error exists at this time among a large portion of the community
in relation to Homœopathy, and it is to be removed by the same
gradual process, by which all kindred errors have been removed
hitherto. By observation it will be found by its advocates, one after
another, that its reputation for success is founded upon mistake,
and it will thus step by step lose its hold upon the public favor,
to make way for some other system, which in its turn must go through
with the same process.
Those who embrace some form of quackery from mercenary views, are
aware of the facility with which the multitude are deceived in regard
to the comparative results of different modes of practice; and it is
this which makes them so confidently anticipate at least a temporary
success. Homœopathy furnishes many examples of this character.
While there are a few in the medical profession, of a peculiar
cast of mind, who are honest Homœopathists; there are others, of
various degrees of intellectual merit, who have adopted this mode
of practice, simply because they have failed to acquire business in
the ordinary way, or because they saw in the adoption of a system,
just now popular, a fair prospect of so increasing business, as to
secure wealth instead of a mere competence; and others still, who
have dubbed themselves physicians, have gone into the practice of
Homœopathy, as mere adventurers, preferring very wisely to try their
luck on the tide of a popular error, instead of trusting to knowledge
and skill, of which they have little or none. These two last classes
of Homœopathic physicians indulge the hope, that the community will
be deceived, in regard to the success of their system of practice,
a sufficient length of time to enable them to realize their golden
expectations; and then, when this false system shall be supplanted
by some other, they will be ready to adopt that other for the same
_solid_ reasons for which they have adopted this.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account